×

Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. (English) Zbl 1070.62527

Summary: In the first half of the paper I study spurious regressions in panel data. Asymptotic properties of the least-squares dummy variable (LSDV) estimator and other conventional statistics are examined. The asymptotics of LSDV estimator are different from those of the spurious regression in the pure time-series. This has an important consequence for residual-based cointegration tests in panel data, because the null distribution of residual-based cointegration tests depends on the asymptotics of LSDV estimator.
In the second half of the paper I study residual-based tests for cointegration regression in panel data. I study Dickey-Fuller (DF) tests and an augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test to test the null of no cointegration. Asymptotic distributions of the tests are derived and Monte Carlo experiments are conducted to evaluate finite sample properties of the proposed tests.

MSC:

62P20 Applications of statistics to economics
62M10 Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH)
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Billingsley, P.: Probability and measure. (1986) · Zbl 0649.60001
[2] Breitung, J.; Meyer, W.: Testing for unit roots in panel data: are wages on different bargaining levels cointegrated? applied economics. 26, 353-361 (1994)
[3] Engle, R. F.; Granger, C. W. J.: Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55, 251-276 (1987) · Zbl 0613.62140
[4] Gonzalo, J.: Five alternative methods of estimating long-run equilibrium relationships. Journal of econometrics 60, 203-233 (1994) · Zbl 0800.62806
[5] Hansen, B.: Efficient estimation and testing of cointegrating vectors in the presence of deterministic trends. Journal of econometrics 53, 87-121 (1992) · Zbl 0746.62105
[6] Haug, A.: Tests for cointegration: A Monte Carlo comparison. Journal of econometrics 71, 89-115 (1996) · Zbl 0850.62901
[7] Im K., Pesaran, H., Shin, Y., 1997. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Manuscript, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge. · Zbl 1041.62075
[8] Kao, C., Chen, B., 1995a. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data when the cross-section and time-series dimensions are comparable. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Syracuse University.
[9] Kao, C., Chen, B., 1995b. Residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data when the cross-section and time-series dimensions are comparable. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Syracuse University.
[10] Kao, C., Chiang, M.-H., 1997. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Econometric Theory, Under Revision.
[11] Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., 1993. Unit root tests in panel data: New results. Discussion Paper, Department of Economics, UC-San Diego.
[12] McCoskey, S., Kao, C., 1998. A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data. Econometric Reviews 17, 57–84. · Zbl 0896.62131
[13] Pedroni, P., 1995. Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Indiana University Working Papers in Economics, No. 95–013.
[14] Pesaran, H.; Smith, R.: Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of econometrics 68, 79-113 (1995) · Zbl 0832.62104
[15] Phillips, P.C.B., Moon, H., 1997. Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper. · Zbl 1056.62532
[16] Phillips, P. C. B.; Ouliaris, S.: Asymptotic properties of residual based test for cointegration. Econometrica 58, 165-193 (1990) · Zbl 0733.62100
[17] Phillips, P. C. B.; Perron, P.: Testing for unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75, 335-346 (1988) · Zbl 0644.62094
[18] Quah, D.: Exploiting cross section variation for unit root inference in dynamic data. Economics letters 44, 9-19 (1994) · Zbl 0796.62107
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.