zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU) -- an outline. (English) Zbl 1074.94021
Summary: It is a deep-seated tradition in science to view uncertainty as a province of probability theory. The generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU) which is outlined in this paper breaks with this tradition and views uncertainty in a much broader perspective. Uncertainty is an attribute of information. A fundamental premise of GTU is that information, whatever its form, may be represented as what is called a generalized constraint. The concept of a generalized constraint is the centerpiece of GTU. In GTU, a probabilistic constraint is viewed as a special--albeit important--instance of a generalized constraint. A generalized constraint is a constraint of the form $X$ isr $R$, where X is the constrained variable, $R$ is a constraining relation, generally non-bivalent, and $r$ is an indexing variable which identifies the modality of the constraint, that is, its semantics. The principal constraints are: possibilistic ($r$ = blank); probabilistic $(r = p)$; veristic $(r = v)$; usuality $(r = u)$; random set $(r = rs)$; fuzzy graph $(r = fg)$; bimodal $(r = bm)$; and group $(r = g)$. Generalized constraints may be qualified, combined and propagated. The set of all generalized constraints together with rules governing qualification, combination and propagation constitutes the generalized constraint language (GCL). The generalized constraint language plays a key role in GTU by serving as a precisiation language for propositions, commands and questions expressed in a natural language. Thus, in GTU the meaning of a proposition drawn from a natural language is expressed as a generalized constraint. Furthermore, a proposition plays the role of a carrier of information. This is the basis for equating information to a generalized constraint. In GTU, reasoning under uncertainty is treated as propagation of generalized constraints, in the sense that rules of deduction are equated to rules which govern propagation of generalized constraints. A concept which plays a key role in deduction is that of a protoform (abbreviation of prototypical form). Basically, a protoform is an abstracted summary -- a summary which serves to identify the deep semantic structure of the object to which it applies. A deduction rule has two parts: symbolic -- expressed in terms of protoforms -- and computational. GTU represents a significant change both in perspective and direction in dealing with uncertainty and information. The concepts and techniques introduced in this paper are illustrated by a number of examples.

94D05Fuzzy sets and logic in connection with communication
68T37Reasoning under uncertainty
Full Text: DOI
[1] Bargiela, A.; Pedrycz, W.: Granular computing. (2002) · Zbl 1046.68052
[2] Bardossy, A.; Duckstein, L.: Fuzzy rule-based modelling with application to geophysical, biological and engineering systems. (1995)
[3] Bloch, I.; Hunter, A.; Appriou, A.; Ayoun, A.; Benferhat, S.; Besnard, P.; Cholvy, L.; Cooke, R.; Cuppens, F.; Dubois, D.; Fargier, H.; Grabisch, M.; Kruse, R.; Lang, J.; Moral, S.; Prade, H.; Saffiotti, A.; Smets, P.; Sossai, C.: Fusion: general concepts and characteristics. International journal of intelligent systems 16, No. 10, 1107-1134 (2001) · Zbl 0989.68162
[4] Bouchon-Meunier, B.; Yager, R. R.; Zadeh, L. A.: Uncertainty in intelligent and information systems. Advances in fuzzy systems--applications and theory 20 (2000)
[5] Bubnicki, Z.: Analysis and decision making in uncertain systems. (2004) · Zbl 1103.93002
[6] Di Nola, A.; Sessa, S.; Pedrycz, W.; Sanchez, E.: Fuzzy relation equations and their applications to knowledge engineering. (1989) · Zbl 0694.94025
[7] Di Nola, A.; Sessa, S.; Pedrycz, W.; Pei-Zhuang, W.: Fuzzy relation equation under a class of triangular norms: a survey and new results fuzzy sets for intelligent systems. (1993)
[8] Dubois, D.; Prade, H.: Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures. Computational intelligence 4, 244-264 (1988)
[9] Dubois, D.; Prade, H.: Gradual inference rules in approximate reasoning. Information sciences: an international journal 61, No. 1-2, 103-122 (1992) · Zbl 0736.68070
[10] D. Dubois, H. Fargier, H. Prade, The calculus of fuzzy restrictions as a basis for flexible constraint satisfaction, in: Proc. 2nd IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, San Francisco, CA, 1993, pp. 1131-1136
[11] D. Dubois, H. Prade, non-standard theories of uncertainty in knowledge representation and reasoning, KR, 1994, pp. 634-645
[12] Dubois, D.; Prade, H.: Fuzzy information engineering: a guided tour of applications. (1996) · Zbl 0905.03008
[13] D. Dubois, H. Fargier, H. Prade, Comparative uncertainty, belief functions and accepted beliefs, UAI, 113-120, 1998
[14] Dubois, D.; Prade, H.: On the use of aggregation operations in information fusion processes. Fuzzy sets and systems 142, No. 1, 143-161 (2004) · Zbl 1091.68107
[15] Filev, D.; Yager, R. R.: Essentials of fuzzy modeling and control. (1994) · Zbl 1002.93530
[16] Goguen, J. A.: The logic of inexact concepts. Synthese 19, 325-373 (1969) · Zbl 0184.00903
[17] Higashi, M.; Klir, G. J.: Measures of uncertainty and information based on possibility distributions, fuzzy sets for intelligent systems. (1993) · Zbl 0497.94008
[18] Jamshidi, M.; Titli, A.; Zadeh, L. A.; Boverie, S.: Applications of fuzzy logic-towards high machine intelligence quotient systems. Environmental and intelligent manufacturing systems series 9 (1997)
[19] Kaufmann, A.; Gupta, M. M.: Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: theory and applications. (1985) · Zbl 0588.94023
[20] Klir, G. J.: Generalized information theory: aims, results, and open problems. Reliability engineering and system safety 85, No. 1-3, 21-38 (2004)
[21] T.Y. Lin, Granular computing on binary relations--analysis of conflict and chinese wall security policy, in: Peters Skowron, Zhong (Eds.), Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing Alpigni, Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence No. 2475, 2002, pp. 296-299
[22] Mamdani, E. H.; Assilian, S.: An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International journal of man-machine studies 7, 1-13 (1975) · Zbl 0301.68076
[23] Mares, M.: Computation over fuzzy quantities. (1994)
[24] R.E. Moore, Interval Analyis, SIAM Studies in Applied Mathematics 2, Philadelphia, PA, 1979
[25] Novak, V.; Perfilieva, I.; Mockor, J.: Mathematical principles of fuzzy logic. (1999)
[26] Nguyen, H. T.: On modeling of linguistic information using random sets, fuzzy sets for intelligent systems. (1993)
[27] Nguyen, H. T.; Kreinovich, V.; Di Nola, A.: Which truth values in fuzzy logics are definable. International journal of intelligent systems 18, No. 10, 1057-1064 (2003) · Zbl 1036.03020
[28] Partee, B.: Montague grammar. (1976) · Zbl 0272.02006
[29] Pedrycz, W.; Gomide, F.: Introduction to fuzzy sets. (1998) · Zbl 0938.03078
[30] Puri, M. L.; Ralescu, D. A.: Fuzzy random variables, fuzzy sets for intelligent systems. (1993)
[31] Ross, T. J.: Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. (2004) · Zbl 1060.93007
[32] F. Rossi, P. Codognet, Soft Constraints, Special Issue on Constraints, Kluwer, vol. 8, no. 1, 2003
[33] Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. (1976) · Zbl 0359.62002
[34] Singpurwalla, N. D.; Booker, J. M.: Membership functions and probability measures of fuzzy sets. Journal of the American statistical association 99, No. 467, 867-889 (2004) · Zbl 1117.62425
[35] Smets, P.: Imperfect information, imprecision and uncertainty. Uncertainty management in information systems, 225-254 (1996)
[36] Yager, R. R.: Uncertainty representation using fuzzy measures. IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics, part B 32, 13-20 (2002)
[37] R.R. Yager, Uncertainty management for intelligence analysis, Technical Report# MII-2414 Machine Intelligence Institute, Iona College, New Rochelle, NY, 2004
[38] Yen, J.; Langari, R.: Fuzzy logic: intelligence, control and information. (1998)
[39] Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets. In control 8, 338-353 (1965) · Zbl 0139.24606
[40] Zadeh, L. A.: Probability measures of fuzzy events. Journal of mathematical analysis and applications 23, 421-427 (1968) · Zbl 0174.49002
[41] Zadeh, L. A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics 3, 28-44 (1973) · Zbl 0273.93002
[42] . Part III: Information sciences 9, 43-80 (1975)
[43] Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets and information granularity. Advances in fuzzy set theory and applications, 3-18 (1979)
[44] Zadeh, L. A.: A theory of approximate reasoning. Machine intelligence, 149-194 (1979)
[45] L.A. Zadeh, Test-score semantics for natural languages and meaning representation via PRUF, in: B. Rieger (Ed.), Empirical Semantics, Bochum, W. Germany: Brockmeyer, 1982; Also Technical Memorandum 246, AI Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1981
[46] Zadeh, L. A.: A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computers and mathematics 9, 149-184 (1983) · Zbl 0517.94028
[47] Zadeh, L. A.: A fuzzy-set-theoretic approach to the compositionality of meaning: propositions, dispositions and canonical forms. Journal of semantics 3, 253-272 (1983)
[48] Zadeh, L. A.: Precisiation of meaning via translation into PRUF. Cognitive constraints on communication, 373-402 (1984)
[49] Zadeh, L. A.: Outline of a computational approach to meaning and knowledge representation based on the concept of the generalized assignment statement. Proceedings of the international seminar on artificial intelligence and man-machine systems, 198-211 (1986)
[50] Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy control: a personal perspective. Control engineering, 51-52 (1996)
[51] Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy logic and the calculi of fuzzy rules and fuzzy graphs. Multiple-valued logic 1, 1-38 (1996) · Zbl 0906.03022
[52] Zadeh, L. A.: Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy sets and systems 90, 111-127 (1997) · Zbl 0988.03040
[53] Zadeh, L. A.: Some reflections on soft computing, granular computing and their roles in the conception, design and utilization of information/intelligent systems. Soft computing 2, 23-25 (1998)
[54] Zadeh, L. A.: From computing with numbers to computing with words--from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. IEEE transactions on circuits and systems 45, 105-119 (1999) · Zbl 0954.68513
[55] Zadeh, L. A.: Toward a perception-based theory of probabilistic reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Journal of statistical planning and inference 105, 233-264 (2002) · Zbl 1010.62005
[56] Zadeh, L. A.: Precisiated natural language (PNL). AI magazine 25, No. 3, 74-91 (2004)