×

Assessing uncertainty in measurement. (English) Zbl 1099.62502

Summary: In 1993 the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), in cooperation with several other international organizations, issued Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement in order to establish, and standardize for international use, a set of general rules for evaluation and expressing uncertainty in measurement. The ISO recommendation has been of concern to many statisticians because it appears to combine frequentist performance measures and indices of subjective distributions in a way that neither frequentists nor Bayesians can fully endorse. The purpose of this review of the ISO Guide is to describe the essential recommendations made in the Guide, then to show how these recommendations can be regarded as approximate solutions to certain frequentist and Bayesian inference problems. The framework thus provided will, hopefully, allow statisticians to develop improvements to the ISO recommendations (particularly in the approximations used), and also better communicate with the physical science researchers who will be following the ISO guidelines.

MSC:

62A01 Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics
62P30 Applications of statistics in engineering and industry; control charts
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DeGroot, M. H. (1986). Probability and Statistics, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. · Zbl 0619.62001
[2] DiCiccio, T. J. and Efron, B. (1996). Bootstrap confidence intervals (with discussion). Statist. Sci. 11 189-229. · Zbl 0955.62574 · doi:10.1214/ss/1032280214
[3] Eisenhart, C. (1963). Realistic evaluation of the precision and accuracy of instrument calibration. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 67C 161-187. [Reprinted, with corrections, in (1969) Precision Measurement and Calibration: Statistical Concepts and Procedures, National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 300 (H. H. Ku, ed.) 1 21-48. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.]
[4] Eisenhart, C. (1968). Expression of the uncertainties of final results. Science 160 1201-1204.
[5] Eisenhart, C. and Collé, R. (1980). Postscript. National Bureau of Standards Manual for Scientific, Technical and Public Information November 2-30 to 2-32. [Reprinted in Eisenhart, C., Ku, H. H. and Collé, R. (1983). Expression of the Uncertainties of Final Measurement Results. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 644, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.]
[6] Hwang, J. T. and Brown, L. D. (1991). Estimated confidence under the validity constraint. Ann. Statist. 19 1964-1977. · Zbl 0755.62007 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176348381
[7] ISO Technical Advisory Group, Working Group 3 (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
[8] Kalbfleisch, J. D. and Sprott, D. A. (1970). Application of likelihood methods to models involving large numbers of parameters (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 32 175- 208. JSTOR: · Zbl 0205.45903
[9] Kiefer, J. (1977). Conditional confidence statements and confidence estimators (with discussion). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 72 789-827. JSTOR: · Zbl 0375.62023 · doi:10.2307/2286460
[10] Ku, H. H. (1990). Uncertainty and Accuracy in physical Measurements. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 805, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
[11] Lu, K. L. and Berger, J. O. (1989). Estimation of normal means: frequentist estimation of loss. Ann. Statist. 17 890-906. · Zbl 0714.62003 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176347149
[12] Parzen, E. (1960). Modern Probability Theory and Its Applications. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0089.33701
[13] Tay lor, B. N. and Kuy att, C. E. (1993). Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Note 1297, physics Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.