Vines – a new graphical model for dependent random variables. (English) Zbl 1101.62339

Summary: A new graphical model, called a vine, for dependent random variables is introduced. Vines generalize the Markov trees often used in modelling high-dimensional distributions. They differ from Markov trees and Bayesian belief nets in that the concept of conditional independence is weakened to allow for various forms of conditional dependence.
Vines can be used to specify multivariate distributions in a straightforward way by specifying various marginal distributions and the ways in which these marginals are to be coupled. Such distributions have applications in uncertainty analysis where the objective is to determine the sensitivity of a model output with respect to the uncertainty in unknown parameters. Expert information is frequently elicited to determine some quantitative characteristics of the distribution such as (rank) correlations. We show that it is simple to construct a minimum information vine distribution, given such expert information. Sampling from minimum information distributions with given marginals and (conditional) rank correlations specified on a vine can be performed almost as fast as independent sampling. A special case of the vine construction generalizes work of H. Joe [Multivariate models and dependence concepts. (1997; Zbl 0990.62517)] and allows the construction of a multivariate normal distribution by specifying a set of partial correlations on which there are no restrictions except the obvious one that a correlation lies between \(-1\) and 1.


62H05 Characterization and structure theory for multivariate probability distributions; copulas
62H10 Multivariate distribution of statistics
05C05 Trees
05C90 Applications of graph theory


Zbl 0990.62517


Full Text: DOI Euclid


[1] ARNOLD, B. C., CASTILLO, E. and SARABIA, J. M. (1999). Conditional Specification of Statistical Models. Springer, New York. · Zbl 0932.62001 · doi:10.1007/b97592
[2] COOKE, R. M. (1995). UNICORN: Methods and Code for Uncertainty Analy sis. Atomic Energy Association, Delft Univ. Technology.
[3] COOKE, R. M. (1997). Markov and entropy properties of treeand vine-dependent variables. Proc. ASA Section on Bayesian Statistical Science 166-175. Amer. Statist. Assoc., Alexandria, VA.
[4] COOKE, R. M., KEANE, M. S. and MEEUWISSEN, A. M. H. (1990). User’s manual for RIAN: Computerized risk assessment. Estec 1233, Delft Univ. Technology.
[5] COOKE, R. M., MEEUWISSEN, A. M. H. and PREy SSL, C. (1991). Modularizing fault tree uncertainty analysis: The treatment of dependent information sources. In Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (G. Apostolakis, ed.). North-Holland, Amsterdam.
[6] CUADRAS, C. M. (1992). Probability distributions with given multivariate marginals and given dependence structure. J. Multivariate Anal. 42 51-66. · Zbl 0773.62034 · doi:10.1016/0047-259X(92)90078-T
[7] GENEST, C., QUESADA, M., JOSÉ, J., RODRIGUEZ, L. and JOSÉ, A. (1995). De l’impossibilité de construire des lois à marges multidimensionnelles données à partir de copules. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 320 723-726. · Zbl 0832.60020
[8] GUIA \?SU, S. (1977). Information Theory with Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York. · Zbl 0379.94027
[9] O’HAGAN, A. (1994). Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics 2B. Bayesian Inference. Arnold, London.
[10] IMAN, R. and CONOVER, W. (1982). A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 11 311-334. · Zbl 0496.65071 · doi:10.1080/03610918208812265
[11] IMAN, R., HELTON, J. and CAMPBELL, J. (1981). An approach to sensitivity analysis of computer models. I, II. J. Quality Technology 13 174-183, 232-240.
[12] JAy NES, E. T. (1983). Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical physics (R. D. Rosenkrantz, ed.). Reidel, Dordrecht.
[13] JOE, H. (1996). Families of m-variate distributions with given margins and m(m 1)/2 bivariate dependence parameters. In Distributions with Fixed Marginals and Related Topics (L. Rüschendorf, B. Schweizer and M. D. Tay lor, eds.) 120-141. IMS, Hay ward, CA. · doi:10.1214/lnms/1215452614
[14] JOE, H. (1997). Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts. Chapman and Hall, London. · Zbl 0990.62517
[15] KENDALL, M. G. and STUART, A. (1967). The Advanced Theory of Statistics 2. Inference and Relationship, 2nd ed. Griffin, London.
[16] KRAAN, B. (2001). Probabilistic inversion in uncertainty analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Delft Univ. Technology.
[17] KULLBACK, S. (1959). Information Theory and Statistics. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0088.10406
[18] LI, H., SCARSINI, M. and SHAKED, M. (1996). Linkages: a tool for the construction of multivariate distributions with given non-overlapping multivariate marginals. J. Multivariate Anal. 56 20-41. · Zbl 0863.62049 · doi:10.1006/jmva.1996.0002
[19] LI, H., SCARSINI, M. and SHAKED, M. (1999). Dy namic linkages for multivariate distributions with given non-overlapping multivariate marginals. J. Multivariate Anal. 68 54-77. · Zbl 0924.60004 · doi:10.1006/jmva.1998.1783
[20] MEEUWISSEN, A. M. H. (1993). Dependent random variables in uncertainty analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Delft Univ. Technology.
[21] MEEUWISSEN, A. M. H. and BEDFORD, T. J. (1997). Minimally informative distributions with given rank correlation for use in uncertainty analysis. J. Statist. Comput. Simulation 57 143-175. · Zbl 0873.62006 · doi:10.1080/00949659708811806
[22] MEEUWISSEN, A. M. H. and COOKE, R. M. (1994). Tree dependent random variables. Technical Report 94-28, Dept. Mathematics, Delft Univ. Technology.
[23] MUIRHEAD, R. J. (1982). Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0556.62028
[24] OLIVER, R. M. and SMITH, J. Q. (eds.) (1990). Influence Diagrams, Belief Nets and Decision Analy sis. Wiley, Chichester.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.