zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Using fuzzy MCDM to select partners of strategic alliances for liner shipping. (English) Zbl 1104.91015
Summary: As world economic activities intensify and trade barriers fall, the formation of viable strategic alliances in the liner shipping industry gains importance and accelerates of necessity. However, the selection of a suitable partner for strategic alliance is not an easy decision, involving a host of complex considerations. Decision-making information is hard to come by and often vague, particularly regarding privately held companies. Fuzzy set theory was designed to sort through the uncertainties of vague linguistic terms and help generate a single possible outcome. This research paper proposes the utilization of the fundamental principles encompassed in the fuzzy set theory to analyze and consider a multiplicity of complex criteria and determines the most suitable partner in strategic shipping alliances. The fundamental emphasis of the current fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making (FMCDM) methodology is the determination, definition, testing and comparison of complex multi-level criteria used in the partnership selection process. The tools and formulas employed are: (1) triangular fuzzy numbers and linguistic values characterized by triangular fuzzy numbers which are used to evaluate the preference rating system; (2) the method of graded mean integration, and the entropy weighting method which are jointly used to adjust integration weights of all sub-criteria above those of the alternatives; (3) the concepts of ideal and anti-ideal solutions which are employed to calculate the relative closeness of the various alternatives versus ideal solutions to rank their priorities, and finally, to determine the best alternative. We design a hypothetical problem in selecting partners of strategic alliances for liner shipping to demonstrate the computational process of this FMCDM algorithm. The main contribution of this paper is that the definition, conversion, and treatment of vague and complex multi-level criteria as set memberships under the fuzzy set theory are employed to develop a practical model for business purpose.

91B06Decision theory
03E72Fuzzy set theory
Full Text: DOI
[1] Angels, R.; Nath, R.: An empirical of EDI trading partner selection criteria in customer-supplier relationships. Information & management 37, No. 5, 241-255 (2000)
[2] Artz, K. W.; Brush, T. H.: Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances. Journal of economic behavior & organization 41, No. 4, 337-362 (2000)
[3] Beamish, P. W.: Joint ventures in LCD: Partner selection and performance. Management international review 34, No. 1, 60-74 (1994)
[4] Belton, V.; Stewart, T. J.: Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. (2002) · Zbl 1200.90122
[5] Chen, S. H.; Hsieh, C. H.: Representation, ranking, distance, and similarity of L-R type fuzzy number and application. Australian journal of intelligent processing systems 6, No. 4, 217-229 (2000)
[6] Cullinane, K.; Khanna, M.: Economies of scale in large containerships: optimal size and geographical implications. Journal of transport geography 8, No. 3, 181-195 (2000)
[7] Dacin, M. T.; Hitt, M. A.; Levitas, E.: Selecting partners for successful international alliances: examination of U.S. And korean firms. Journal of world business 32, No. 1, 3-16 (1997)
[8] Das, T. K.; Teng, M.: Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of management review 23, No. 3, 491-512 (1998)
[9] Dubois, D.; Prade, H.: Operation on fuzzy numbers. The international journal of systems sciences 9, No. 6, 613-626 (1978) · Zbl 0383.94045
[10] Feng, C. M.; Chen, C. F.: The determination of criteria weights-compromised weighting method. Traffic and transportation 14, 51-67 (1992)
[11] C.M. Fong, Business competitive advantage, Taiwan: fcmc.com, 2000
[12] Geringer, J. M.: Strategic determinants of partner selection criteria in international joint ventures. Journal of international business studies 22, No. 1, 41-62 (1991)
[13] Geringer, J. M.; Hebert, L.: Measuring performance of international joint ventures. Journal of international business studies 22, No. 2, 249-263 (1991)
[14] Heaver, T.; Meersman, H.; Moglia, F.; Van De Voorde, E.: Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?. Maritime policy and management 27, No. 4, 363-373 (2000)
[15] Johnson, J. L.; Cullen, J. B.; Sakano, T.; Takenouchi, H.: Setting the stage for trust and strategic integration in Japanese-U.S. Cooperative alliances. Journal of international business studies 27, No. 5, 981-1004 (1996)
[16] J. Jossey, Birth of the global alliance, Containerisation International October (1994) 49-55
[17] M.H. Kadar, The future of global strategic alliances, Containerisation International April (1996) 81-85
[18] Kadar, M. H.; Deproost, D.: Back to the ’basics’ of marketing, pricing, and selling. Containerisation international, No. 1, 49-51 (1997)
[19] Kale, P.; Singh, H.; Perlmutter, H.: Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic management journal 21, No. 3, 217-237 (2000)
[20] Kleymann, B.; Seristo, H.: Levels of airline alliance membership: balancing risks and benefits. Journal of air transport management 7, No. 5, 303-310 (2001)
[21] Klopack, T. G.: Strategic outsourcing: balancing the risks and the benefits. Drug discovery today 5, No. 4, 157-160 (2000)
[22] Lee, W. R.; Chao, W. C.; Wu, M. C.: Partner selection determinants and alliance performance: an empirical study of Taiwan’s information firms. Management review 19, No. 3, 1-24 (2000)
[23] Lewis, J. D.: Partnerships for profit: structuring and managing strategic alliances. (1990)
[24] Liang, G. S.: Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts. European journal of operation research 112, 682-691 (1999) · Zbl 0933.90070
[25] Lorange, P.: Strategic re-thinking in shipping companies. Maritime policy and management 28, No. 1, 23-32 (2001)
[26] Merrifield, B.: Strategic alliance in the global marketplace. Research technology management 32, No. 1, 15-20 (1989)
[27] Midoro, R.; Pitto, A.: A critical evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping. Maritime policy and management 27, No. 1, 31-40 (2000)
[28] Oxley, J. E.: Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. Journal of economic behavior & organization 38, No. 3, 283-309 (1999)
[29] Phillips, F.: Six alliances that could rule the world. Lloyd’s list maritime Asia February, 10 (1998)
[30] Richter, F. J.; Vettel, K.: Successful joint ventures in Japan: transferring knowledge through organizational learning. Long range planning 28, No. 3, 37-45 (1995)
[31] Ryoo, D. K.; Thanopoulou, H. A.: Liner alliances in the globalization era: a strategic tool for asian container carriers. Maritime policy and management 26, No. 4, 349-367 (1999)
[32] Saaty, T. L.: The analytic hierarchy process. (1980) · Zbl 0587.90002
[33] Slack, B.; Comtois, C.; Mccalla, R.: Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: a global perspective. Maritime policy and management 29, No. 1, 65-76 (2002)
[34] Song, D. W.: Port co-opetition as a new strategic option. Seaview 56, 2-8 (2001)
[35] Tang, S. M.; Lin, S. -J.: Creating and verify the correlation model of strategy alliance management and performance. Journal of management & systems 8, No. 1, 37-60 (2001)
[36] Tsang, W. K.: Motives for strategic alliance: a resource-based perspective. Journal of management 14, No. 3, 207-221 (1998)
[37] Weaver, K. M.; Dickson, P. H.: Outcome quality of small to medium sized enterprise-based alliances: the role of perceived partner behaviors. Journal of business venturing 13, No. 6, 505-522 (1998)
[38] Yang, Y. C.: An interrelationship analysis on motivation and partner selection factors of liner strategic alliance across Taiwan strait. Maritime quarterly 11, No. 2, 89-112 (2002)
[39] Yoshino, M. Y.; Rangan, U. S.: Strategic alliances: an entrepreneurial approach to globalization. (1995)
[40] Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and control 8, No. 3, 338-353 (1965) · Zbl 0139.24606
[41] Zeleny, M.: Multiple criteria decision making. (1982) · Zbl 0588.90019