##
**Numerical manifold method based on the method of weighted residuals.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1109.74373

Summary: Usually, the governing equations of the numerical manifold method (NMM) are derived from the minimum potential energy principle. For many applied problems it is difficult to derive in general outset the functional forms of the governing equations. This obviously strongly restricts the implementation of the minimum potential energy principle or other variational principles in NMM. In fact, the governing equations of NMM can be derived from a more general method of weighted residuals. By choosing suitable weight functions, the derivation of the governing equations of the NMM from the weighted residual method leads to the same result as that derived from the minimum potential energy principle. This is demonstrated in the paper by deriving the governing equations of the NMM for linear elasticity problems, and also for Laplace’s equation for which the governing equations of the NMM cannot be derived from the minimum potential energy principle. The performance of the method is illustrated by three numerical examples.

### MSC:

74S30 | Other numerical methods in solid mechanics (MSC2010) |

74B05 | Classical linear elasticity |

### Keywords:

Numerical manifold method; method of weighted residuals; Galerkin method; manifold element; finite covers
Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | Belytschko T, Lu YY, Gu L (1994) Element-free Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 37: 229-256 · Zbl 0796.73077 |

[2] | Yumin C, Aixiang H (1996) Boundary element analysis package BESMAP and its engineering application Journal of tongji university, 24(6): 726-730 (in Chinese) |

[3] | Guanqi C, Ohnishi Y, Ito T (1998) Development of high-order manifold method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 43: 685-712 · Zbl 0945.74078 |

[4] | Yaw-Jeng C, Yu-Min L, Ren-Jow T (2002) Mixed mode fracture propagation by manifold method. Int J Fracture. 114: 327-347. |

[5] | Ewalds H, Wanhill R (1989) Fracture Mechanics. Edward Arnold: New York |

[6] | Cheng-yu K (2001) Modeling of jointed rock mass based on the numerical manifold method. Ph.D, University of Pittsburgh |

[7] | Xing J, Yumin C (1997) The develop of boundary element method and its program£®Shanghai, Tongji University press (in Chinese) |

[8] | Jeen-Shang L (2003) A mesh-based partition of unity method for discontinuity modeling. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 192: 1515-1532 · Zbl 1031.74052 |

[9] | Shi GH (1992) Modeling Rock Joints and Blocks by Manifold Method. Proceedings of 32nd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Santa Fe, New Mexico 639-648 |

[10] | Shi GH (1996) Manifold method of material analysis. In: Proc. of IFDDA?1996. Berkeley, California, USA, pp. 52-204 |

[11] | Shi GH (1997) Numerical manifold method. Proc. of the second international conference on analysis of discontinuous deformation, Kyoto, Japan pp. 1-35 |

[12] | Shi GH (1998) Discontinuous deformation analysis: a new numerical model for the statics and dynamics of block systems. Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley |

[13] | Smith IM, Griffiths DV (1998) Programming the finite element method. Third edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |

[14] | Kenjiro T, Asai M, Yamagishi M (2003) Finite cover method for linear and non-linear analyses of heterogeneous solids. Int J Numer Meth Eng 58: 1321-1346. · Zbl 1032.74685 |

[15] | Xu ci-da 1987 WMR in solid mechanics. Shanghai, Tongji university press, (in Chinese) |

[16] | Zienkiewicz OC (1977) The Finite Element Method in Engineering. London: 3nd (edn.) McGraw-Hill |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.