zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Data-driven smooth tests of the proportional hazards assumption. (English) Zbl 1121.62086
Summary: A new test of the proportional hazards assumption in the Cox model is proposed. The idea is based on Neyman’s smooth tests. The Cox model with proportional hazards (i.e., time-constant covariate effects) is embedded in a model with a smoothly time-varying covariate effect that is expressed as a combination of some basis functions (e.g., Legendre polynomials, cosines). Then the smooth test is the score test for significance of these artificial covariates. Furthermore, we apply a modification of Schwarz’s selection rule to choosing the dimension of the smooth model (the number of the basis functions). The score test is then used in the selected model. In a simulation study, we compare the proposed tests with standard tests based on the score process.

62N03 Testing in survival analysis and censored data
62F03 Parametric hypothesis testing
Full Text: DOI
[1] Abrahamowicz M, MacKenzie T, Esdaile JM (1996) Time-dependent hazard ratio: modeling and hypothesis testing with application in lupus nephritis. J Am Stat Assoc 91:1432–1439 · Zbl 0882.62101
[2] Andersen PK, Gill RD (1982) Cox’s regression model for counting processes: a large sample study. Ann Stat 10:1100–1120 · Zbl 0526.62026
[3] Andersen PK, Borgan Ø, Gill RD, Keiding N (1993) Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer, New York · Zbl 0769.62061
[4] Claeskens G, Hjort NL (2004) Goodness of fit via non-parametric likelihood ratios. Scand J Stat 31:487–513 · Zbl 1065.62056
[5] Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 34:187–220 · Zbl 0243.62041
[6] Fleming TR, Harrington DP (1991) Counting processes and survival analysis. Wiley, New York · Zbl 0727.62096
[7] Inglot T, Ledwina T (2004) Refined version of data driven Neyman’s test. Preprint 001, Institute of Mathematics, Wrocław University of Technology · Zbl 1047.62037
[8] Inglot T, Kallenberg WCM, Ledwina T (1997) Data driven smooth tests for composite hypotheses. Ann Stat 25:1222–1250 · Zbl 0904.62055
[9] Janssen A (2003) Which power of goodness of fit tests can really be expected: intermediate versus contiguous alternatives. Stat Decisions 21:301–325 · Zbl 1041.62037
[10] Kallenberg WCM, Ledwina T (1995) On data driven Neyman’s tests. Prob Math Stat 15:409–426 · Zbl 0847.62034
[11] Kallenberg WCM, Ledwina T (1997) Data-driven smooth tests when the hypothesis is composite. J Am Stat Assoc 92:1094–1104 · Zbl 1067.62534
[12] Kraus D (2006) Identifying nonproportional covariates in the Cox model. Research Report 2170, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Prague · Zbl 1274.62663
[13] Kvaløy JT, Neef LR (2004) Tests for the proportional intensity assumption based on the score process. Lifetime Data Anal 10:139–157 · Zbl 1096.62100
[14] Ledwina T (1994) Data-driven version of Neyman’s smooth test of fit. J Am Stat Assoc 89:1000–1005 · Zbl 0805.62022
[15] Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z (1993) Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals. Biometrika 80:557–572 · Zbl 0788.62094
[16] Martinussen T, Scheike TH, Skovgaard IM (2002) Efficient estimation of fixed and time-varying covariate effects in multiplicative intensity models. Scand J Stat 29:57–74 · Zbl 1017.62094
[17] Peña EA (1998a) Smooth goodness-of-fit tests for composite hypothesis in hazard based models. Ann Stat 26:1935–1971 · Zbl 0934.62023
[18] Peña EA (1998b) Smooth goodness-of-fit tests for the baseline hazard in Cox’s proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc 93:673–692 · Zbl 0953.62043
[19] Peña EA (2003) Classes of fixed-order and adaptive smooth goodness-of-fit tests with discrete right-censored data. In: Mathematical and statistical methods in reliability (Trondheim, 2002). World Sci Publishing, River Edge
[20] Scheike TH, Martinussen T (2004) On estimation and tests of time-varying effects in the proportional hazards model. Scand J Stat 31:51–62 · Zbl 1053.62111
[21] Woodroofe M (1978) Large deviations of likelihood ratio statistics with applications to sequential testing. Ann Stat 6:72–84 · Zbl 0386.62019
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.