×

A backstepping approach to ship course control. (English) Zbl 1122.93351

Summary: As an object of course control, the ship is characterised by a nonlinear function describing static manoeuvring characteristics that reflect the steady-state relation between the rudder deflection and the rate of turn of the hull. One of the methods which can be used for designing a nonlinear ship course controller is the backstepping method. It is used here for designing two configurations of nonlinear controllers, which are then applied to ship course control. The parameters of the obtained nonlinear control structures are tuned to optimise the operation of the control system. The optimisation is performed using genetic algorithms. The quality of operation of the designed control algorithms is checked in simulation tests performed on the mathematical model of a tanker. In order to obtain reference results to be used for comparison with those recorded for nonlinear controllers designed using the backstepping method, a control system with the PD controller is examined as well.

MSC:

93B52 Feedback control
93C95 Application models in control theory
90C59 Approximation methods and heuristics in mathematical programming
93D30 Lyapunov and storage functions

Software:

Genocop
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI EuDML

References:

[1] Amerongen J. (1982): Adaptive steering of ship. A model reference approach to improved manoeuvering and economical course keeping. - Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands.
[2] Åström K.J. and Wittenmark B. (1989): Adaptive Control. - Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. · Zbl 0686.93061
[3] Do K.D., Jiang Z.P. and Pan J. (2004): Robust adaptive path following of underactuated ships. - Automatica, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 929-944. · Zbl 1096.93021
[4] Ezal K., Pan Z. and Kokotović P. (2000): Locally optimal and robust backstepping design. - IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 260-271. · Zbl 0973.93008
[5] Fang Y., Zergeroglu E., Queiroz M.S. and Dawson D.M. (2004): Global output feedback control of dynamically positioned surface vessels: an adaptive control approach. - Mechatron. Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 341-356.
[6] Fleming P.J. and Purshouse R.C. (2002): Evolutionary algorithms in control systems engineering: A survey. - Contr. Engi. Pract., Vol. 10, No. 11, pp. 1223-1241.
[7] Fossen T.I. and Strand J.P. (1998): Nonlinear ship control (Tutorial paper). - Proc. IFAC Conf. Control Application in Marine Systems CAMS’98. Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 1-75. Available at www.itk.ntnu.no/ansatte/Fossen_Thor/book/tutorial98.pdf
[8] Fossen T.I. and Strand J.P. (1999): A tutorial on nonlinear back-stepping: Applications to ship control. - Modell., Identif. Control, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 83-135.
[9] Fossen T.I. (2002): Marine Control Systems. Guidance, Navigation, and Control of Ships, Rigs and Underwater Vehicles. - Trondheim, Norway: Marine Cybernetics.
[10] Goldberg D.E. (1989): Genetic Algorithms in Searching, Optimisation and Machine Learning. - Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
[11] Häkegard O. (2003): Backstepping and control allocation with applications to flight control. - Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Sweden.
[12] He S., Reif K. and Unbehauen R. (1998): A neural approach for control of nonlinear systems with feedback linearization. - IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 1409-1421.
[13] Jiang Z.P. (2002): Global tracking control of underactuated ships by Lyapunov direct method. - Automat., Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 301-309. · Zbl 0991.93085
[14] Kokotović P. and Arcak M. (2001): Constructive nonlinear control: A historical perspective. - Automat., Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 637-662. · Zbl 1153.93301
[15] Krstić M., Kanellakopulos I. and Kokotović P.V. (1995): Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. - New York: Wiley.
[16] Krstić M. and Deng H. (1998): Stabilization of Nonlinear Uncertain Systems. - Berlin: Springer. · Zbl 0906.93001
[17] Krstić M. and Tsiotras P. (1999): Inverse optimal stabilization of a rigid spacecraft. - IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 1042-1049. · Zbl 1136.93424
[18] Kuljaca O., Swamy N., Lewis F.L and Kwan C.M. (2001): Design and implementation of industrial neural network controller using backstepping. - Proc. 40th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control Orlando, FL, pp. 2709-2714.
[19] Kwan C.M. and Lewis F.L. (2000): Robust backstepping control of nonlinear systems using neural networks. - IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part A: Syst. Humans, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 753-766.
[20] La Salle J. and Lefschetz S. (1961): Stability by Liapunov’s direct method with applications. - Academic Press, New York. · Zbl 0098.06102
[21] Lim C.C. and Forsythe W. (1983): Autopilot for ship control. - IEE Proc. Vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 281-295.
[22] Michalewicz Z. (1996): Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. - Berlin: Springer. · Zbl 0841.68047
[23] Moradi M.H. and Katebi M.R. (2001): Predictive PID control for ship autopilot design. - Proc. Control Applications in Marine Systems 2001, CAMS’2001, Glasgow, UK, pp. 375-380.
[24] Pettersen K.Y. and Nijmeijer H. (2004): Global practical stabilization and tracking for an underactuated ship. A combined averaging and backstepping approach. - Modell. Identif. Contr., Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 189-199.
[25] Sepulchre R., Jankovic M. and Kokotović P.V. (1997): Constructive Nonlinear Control. - Berlin: Springer. · Zbl 0876.93082
[26] Skjetne R., Fossen T.I. and Kokotović P.V. (2005): Adaptive maneuvering, with experiments, for a model ship in a marine control laboratory. - Automat. Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 289-298. · Zbl 1096.93026
[27] Zhang T., Ge S.S. and Hang C.C. (2000): Adaptive neural network control for strict-feedback nonlinear systems using backstepping design. - Automat., Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 1835-1846. · Zbl 0976.93046
[28] Zhang Y., Peng P.Y. and Jiang Z.P. (2000): Stable neural controller design for unknown nonlinear systems using backstepping. - IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 1347-1360.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.