A fuzzy goal programming method with imprecise goal hierarchy. (English) Zbl 1123.90082

Summary: Two most widely used approaches to treating goals of different importance in goal programming (GP) are: (1) weighted GP, where importance of goals is modelled using weights, and (2) preemptive priority GP, where a goal hierarchy is specified implying infinite trade-offs among goals placed in different levels of importance. These approaches may be too restrictive in modelling of real life decision making problems. In this paper, a novel fuzzy goal programming method is proposed, where the hierarchical levels of the goals are imprecisely defined. The imprecise importance relations among the goals are modelled using fuzzy relations. An additive achievement function is defined, which takes into consideration both achievement degrees of the goals and degrees of satisfaction of the fuzzy importance relations. Examples are given to illustrate the proposed method.


90C70 Fuzzy and other nonstochastic uncertainty mathematical programming
90C29 Multi-objective and goal programming
Full Text: DOI


[1] Bellman, R. E.; Zadeh, L. A., Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, Management Science, 17, 4, B141-B164 (1970) · Zbl 0224.90032
[2] Chanas, S.; Kuchta, D., Fuzzy goal programming - One notion, many meanings, Control and Cybernetics, 31, 4, 871-890 (2002) · Zbl 1180.90381
[3] Chen, L.-H.; Tsai, F.-C., Fuzzy goal programming with different importance and priorities, European Journal of Operational Research, 133, 548-556 (2001) · Zbl 1053.90140
[4] Gass, S. I., The setting of weights in linear goal-programming problems, Computers & Operations Research, 14, 3, 227-229 (1987)
[5] Hannan, E. L., Linear programming with multiple fuzzy goals, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 6, 235-248 (1981) · Zbl 0465.90080
[6] Hannan, E. L., On fuzzy goal programming, Decision Sciences, 12, 522-531 (1981)
[7] Hannan, E. L., An assessment of some criticisms of goal programming, Computers & Operations Research, 12, 6, 525-541 (1985) · Zbl 0606.90068
[8] Jones, D. F.; Tamiz, M., Goal programming in the period 1990-2000, (Ehrgott, M.; Gandibleux, X., Multiple Criteria Optimization, State of the Art Annotated Bibliographic Surveys (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Kluwer Academic Publishers USA), 129-170 · Zbl 1095.90594
[9] Min, H.; Storbeck, J., On the origin and persistence of misconceptions in goal programming, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42, 4, 301-312 (1991)
[10] Mohamed, R. H., The relationship between goal programming and fuzzy programming, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 89, 215-222 (1997)
[11] Mohandas, S. U.; Phelps, T. A.; Ragsdell, K. M., Structural optimisation using a fuzzy goal programming approach, Computers & Structures, 37, 1, 1-8 (1990)
[12] Mohanty, B. K.; Vijayaraghavan, T. A.S., A multi-objective programming problem and its equivalent goal programming problem with appropriate priorities and aspiration levels: A fuzzy approach, Computers & Operations Research, 22, 8, 771-778 (1995) · Zbl 0840.90114
[13] Narasimhan, R., Goal programming in a fuzzy environment, Decision Sciences, 11, 325-336 (1980)
[14] Romero, C., A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model, European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 675-686 (2004) · Zbl 1099.90576
[15] Steuer, R. E., Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application (1986), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons Singapore · Zbl 0663.90085
[16] Tiwari, R. N.; Dharmar, S.; Rao, J. R., Fuzzy goal programming - An additive model, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 24, 27-34 (1987) · Zbl 0627.90073
[17] Wang, H.-F.; Fu, C.-C., A generalization of fuzzy goal programming with preemptive structure, Computers & Operations Research, 24, 9, 819-828 (1997) · Zbl 0893.90175
[18] Zimmermann, H.-J., Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Kluwer Academic Publishers USA · Zbl 0969.54002
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.