zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
A supply chain model with direct and retail channels. (English) Zbl 1137.91388
Summary: We study a dual channel supply chain in which a manufacturer sells to a retailer as well as to consumers directly. Consumers choose the purchase channel based on price and service qualities. The manufacturer decides the price of the direct channel and the retailer decides both price and order quantity. We develop conditions under which the manufacturer and the retailer share the market in equilibrium. We show that the difference in marginal costs of the two channels plays an important role in determining the existence of dual channels in equilibrium. We also show that demand variability has a major influence on the equilibrium prices and on the manufacturer’s motivation for opening a direct channel. In the case that the manufacturer and the retailer coordinate and follow a centralized decision maker, we show that adding a direct channel will increase the overall profit. Our numerical results show that an increase in retailer’s service quality may increase the manufacturer’s profit in dual channel and a larger range of consumer service sensitivity may benefit both parties in the dual channel. Our results suggest that the manufacturer is likely to be better off in the dual channel than in the single channel when the retailer’s marginal cost is high and the wholesale price, consumer valuation and the demand variability are low.

91B24Price theory and market structure
90B05Inventory, storage, reservoirs
Full Text: DOI
[1] Alba, J.; Lynch, J.; Weitz, B.; Janiszewski, C.; Lutz, R.; Wood, S.: Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces, Journal of marketing 61, 38-53 (1997)
[2] Balasubramanian, S.: Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers, Marketing science 17, 181-195 (1998)
[3] Boyaci, T., 2004. competitive stocking and coordination in a multiple-channel distribution system. Working paper, McGill University.
[4] Cachon, G.; Netessine, S.: Game theory in supply chain analysis, Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: modeling in the ebusiness era (2004) · Zbl 1138.91365
[5] Cattani, K.; Gilland, W.; Heese, S.; Swaminathan, J.: Boiling frogs: pricing strategies for a manufacturer adding an Internet channel, Production and operations management 15, No. 1, 40-56 (2006)
[6] Chiang, W. K.; Chhajed, D.; Hess, J. D.: Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design, Management science 49, 1-20 (2003) · Zbl 1232.90231 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.
[7] Dabholkar, P. A.: Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: an investigation of alternative models of service quality, International journal of research in marketing 13, 29-51 (1996)
[8] Devaraj, S.; Fan, M.; Kohli, R.: Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating E-commerce metrics, Information systems research 13, No. 3, 316-333 (2002)
[9] Gabszewicz, J.; Thisse, J.: Price competition, quality and income disparities, Journal of economic theory 20, 340-359 (1979) · Zbl 0421.90012 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(79)90041-3
[10] Girard, T.; Korgaonkar, P.; Silverblatt, R.: Relationship of type of product, shopping orientations, and demographics with preference for shopping on the Internet, Journal of business and psychology 18, No. 1, 101-120 (2003)
[11] Gronroos, C.: A service quality model and its marketing implications, European journal of marketing 18, No. 4, 6-44 (1984)
[12] Hanover, D.: It’s not a threat just a promise, Chain store age 75, No. 9, 176 (1999)
[13] Hoffman, D. L.; Novak, T. P.: Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations, Journal of marketing 60, 50-68 (1996)
[14] Hotelling, H.: Stability in competition, Economic journal 39, 41-57 (1929)
[15] Keen, C.; Wetzels, M.; Ruyter, K.; Feinberg, R.: E-tailers versus retailers: which factors determine consumer preference, Journal of business research 57, 685-696 (1996)
[16] Kotler, P.; Armstrong, G.: Principles of marketing, (1991)
[17] Liang, T.; Huang, J.: An empirical study on consumer acceptance of products in electronic markets: A transaction cost model, Decision support systems 24, 29-43 (1998)
[18] Mangalindan, M.: Online retail sales are expected to rise to $172 billion this year, The wall street journal, No. May 24 (2005)
[19] Mas-Colell, A.; Whinston, M. D.; Green, J. R.: Microeconomic theory, (1995)
[20] Mcwilliams, G.; Zimmerman, A.: Dell plans to peddle pcs insider sears, other large chains, The wall street journal, No. January 30 (2003)
[21] Mills, E. S.: Uncertainty and price theory, Quarterly journal of economics 73, 116-130 (1959)
[22] Palmer, J.: Gateway’s gains, Barron’s. chicopee. 84, No. 48, 12-14 (2004)
[23] Petruzzi, N. C.; Dada, M.: Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions, Operations research 47, No. 2, 183-194 (1999) · Zbl 1005.90546 · doi:10.1287/opre.47.2.183
[24] Rhee, B., Park, S.Y., 2000. Online stores as a new direct channel and emerging hybrid channel system. Working paper, HKUST.
[25] Rohm, A. J.; Swaminathan, V.: A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations, Journal of business research 57, 748-757 (2004)
[26] Shaked, A.; Sutton, J.: Natural oligopolies, Econometrica 51, No. 5, 1469-1483 (1983) · Zbl 0521.90026 · doi:10.2307/1912285
[27] Shaked, A.; Sutton, J.: Product differentiation and industrial structure, The journal of industrial economics 36, No. 2, 131-146 (1987)
[28] Stringer, K.: Style & substance: shopper who blend store, catalog, and web spend more, The wall street journal, No. September 3 (2004)
[29] Tranchtenberg, J.: Random house considers online sales of its books, The wall street journal, No. December 15 (2004)
[30] Tsay, A.; Agrawal, N.: Channel conflict and coordination in the E-commerce age, Production and operations management 13, No. 1, 93-110 (2004)
[31] Viswanathan, V.: Competing across technology-differentiated channels: the impact of network externalities and switching costs, Management science 51, No. 3, 483-496 (2005)
[32] Warshaw, P.; Droge, C.: Economic utility versus the attitudinal perspective of consumer choice, Journal of economic psychology 7, No. 1, 37-60 (1986)
[33] Wilder, C.: Hp’s online push, Information week, No. May 31 (1999)