##
**Testing the accuracy of employee-reported data: an inexpensive alternative approach to traditional methods.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1142.91402

Summary: Although Information Technology (IT) solutions improve the collection and validation of operational data, Operations Managers must often rely on self-reported data from workers to make decisions. The problem with this data is that they are subject to intentional manipulation, thus reducing their suitability for decision-making. A method of identifying manipulated data, digital analysis, addresses this problem at low cost. In this paper, we demonstrate how one uses this method in real-world companies to validate self-reported data from line workers. The results of our study suggest that digital analysis estimates the accuracy of employee reported data in operations management, within limited contexts. These findings lead to improved operating performance by providing a tool for practitioners to exclude inaccurate information.

### MSC:

91B06 | Decision theory |

PDFBibTeX
XMLCite

\textit{D. N. Hales} et al., Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189, No. 3, 583--593 (2008; Zbl 1142.91402)

### References:

[1] | Becker, P., Patterns in listings of failure and MTTF values and listings of other data, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-31, 132-134 (1982) · Zbl 0485.90043 |

[2] | Benford, F., 1938. The Law of Anomalous Numbers, In: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 78, pp. 551-572.; Benford, F., 1938. The Law of Anomalous Numbers, In: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 78, pp. 551-572. · Zbl 0018.26502 |

[3] | Brown, R. J.C., Benford’s Law and the screening of analytical data: The case of pollutant concentrations in ambient air, Analyst, 130, 9, 1280-1285 (2005) |

[4] | Browne, M., Following Benford’s law or looking out for number 1, New York Times, 147, 51239, F4 (1998) |

[5] | Deming, W. E., Out of the Crisis (1986), Cambridge Press: Cambridge Press Cambridge |

[6] | Hales, D., Sridharan, V, Radhakrishnan, A., Siha, S., 2004. Testing the Accuracy of Employee Reported Data, In: Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute, pp. 3901-3906.; Hales, D., Sridharan, V, Radhakrishnan, A., Siha, S., 2004. Testing the Accuracy of Employee Reported Data, In: Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute, pp. 3901-3906. |

[7] | Hill, T., A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law, Statistical Science, 10, 4, 354-363 (1995) · Zbl 0955.60509 |

[8] | Hill, T., A note on the distribution of true vs. fabricated data, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 3, 776-778 (1996) |

[9] | Hill, T., The first-digit phenomenon, American Scientist, 86, 358-363 (1998) |

[10] | Newcomb, S., Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers, American Journal of Mathematics, 4, 1 of 4, 39-40 (1881) · JFM 13.0161.01 |

[11] | Nigrini, M., A Taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s law, Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18, 72-91 (1996) |

[12] | Nigrini, M., Using digital frequencies to detect fraud, The White Paper, April/May, 3-6 (1996) |

[13] | Nigrini, M.; Mittermaier, L., The use of Benford’s law as an aid in analytical procedures, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 16, 52-67 (1997) |

[14] | Nigrini, M., Numerology for accountants, Journal of Accountancy, 186, 15 (1998) |

[15] | Nigrini, M., I’ve got your number, Journal of Accountancy, 187, 79-83 (1999) |

[16] | Nigrini, M., Digital Analysis Using Benford’s Law (2000), ACL Publishing |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.