zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Hidden semi-Markov model-based methodology for multi-sensor equipment health diagnosis and prognosis. (English) Zbl 1163.90784
Summary: This paper presents an integrated platform for multi-sensor equipment diagnosis and prognosis. This integrated framework is based on hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM). Unlike a state in a standard hidden Markov model (HMM), a state in an HSMM generates a segment of observations, as opposed to a single observation in the HMM. Therefore, HSMM structure has a temporal component compared to HMM. In this framework, states of HSMMs are used to represent the health status of a component. The duration of a health state is modeled by an explicit Gaussian probability function. The model parameters (i.e., initial state distribution, state transition probability matrix, observation probability matrix, and health-state duration probability distribution) are estimated through a modified forward--backward training algorithm. The re-estimation formulae for model parameters are derived. The trained HSMMs can be used to diagnose the health status of a component. Through parameter estimation of the health-state duration probability distribution and the proposed backward recursive equations, one can predict the useful remaining life of the component. To determine the “value” of each sensor information, discriminant function analysis is employed to adjust the weight or importance assigned to a sensor. Therefore, sensor fusion becomes possible in this HSMM based framework.The validation of the proposed framework and methodology are carried out in real world applications: monitoring hydraulic pumps from Caterpillar Inc. The results show that the increase of correct diagnostic rate is indeed very promising. Furthermore, the equipment prognosis can be implemented in the same integrated framework.

MSC:
90C40Markov and semi-Markov decision processes
WorldCat.org
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Agrawal, R., Srikant, R., 1995. Mining sequential patterns. In: Proc. 1995 Int. Conf. Data Engineering (ICDE’95), Taipei, Taiwan, March 1995, pp. 3 -- 14.
[2] Atlas, L., Ostendorf, M., Bernard, G.D., 2000. Hidden Markov models for monitoring machining tool-wear. In: ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing --- Proceedings, vol. 6, pp. 3887 -- 3890.
[3] Banta, L.; Rawson, K. D.: Sensor fusion for mining robots. IEEE transactions on industry applications 30, No. 5, 1321-1325 (1994)
[4] Baruah, P., Chinnam, R.B., 2003. HMMs for diagnostics and prognostics in machining processes. In: Proc. of the 57th Society for Machine Failure Prevention Technology Conference, Virginia Beach, VA, April 14 -- 18. · Zbl 1068.90554
[5] Begg, C.D., Merdes, T., Byington, C., Maynard, K., 1999. Dynamic modeling for mechanical diagnostics and prognostics. In: Maintenance and Reliability Conference (MARCON99).
[6] Brotherton, T.; Jahns, G.; Jacobs, J.; Wroblewski, D.: Prognosis of faults in gas turbine engines. IEEE aerospace conference Proceedings 6, 163-172 (2000)
[7] Bunks, C.; Mccarthy, D.; Tarik, A.: Condition based maintenance of machines using hidden Markov models. Mechanical systems and signal processing 14, No. 4, 597-612 (2000)
[8] Byington, C. S.; Garga, A. K.: Data fusion for developing predictive diagnostics for electromechanical systems. Handbook of multisensor data fusion (2001)
[9] Cai, X. G.; Ma, P.: Study on simultaneous fault diagnosis based information fusion technique. Proceedings of the chinese society of electrical engineering 23, No. 5, 112-115 (2003)
[10] Carlson, J., Spiewak, S.A., 1992. Vibration based machine condition monitoring: The state of practice. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting on Vibration Institute, Williamsburg, June 9 -- 11, pp. 87 -- 95.
[11] Caudill, M.: Using neural nets: hybrid expert networks. AI expert, No. November, 49-54 (1990)
[12] Davis, R.: Diagnostic reasoning based on structure and behavior. Artificial intelligence 24, 347-410 (1984)
[13] David, J.M., Krivine, J.P., 1987. Three artificial intelligence issues in fault diagnosis: Declarative programming, expert systems, and model-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Fault Diagnostics, Reliability and Related Knowledge Based Approaches, UMIST, Manchester, April 6 -- 8, pp. 190 -- 196.
[14] Ertunc, H. M.; Loparo, K. A.: A decision fusion algorithm for tool wear condition monitoring in drilling. International journal of machine tools and manufacture 41, 1347-1362 (2001)
[15] Ertunc, H. M.; Loparo, K. A.; Ocak, H.: Tool wear condition monitoring in drilling operations using hidden Markov models (HMMs). International journal of machine tools and manufacture 41, 1363-1384 (2001)
[16] Falaschi, A.: Continuously variable transition probability HMM for speech recognition. Speech recognition and understanding, 125-130 (1992)
[17] Ferguson, J.D., 1980. Variable duration models for speech. In: Proc. Symposium on the Application of Hidden Markov Models to Text and Speech, pp. 143 -- 179.
[18] Ghartemani, M.K., Mokhtari, H., Iravani, M.R., 2002. Performance of a fault diagnosis method based on wavelet characterization. In: 2002 45th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 387 -- 390.
[19] Gu, H. -Y.; Tseng, C. -Y.; Lee, L. -S.: Isolated-utterance speech recognition using hidden Markov models with bounded state duration. IEEE transactions on signal processing 39, No. 8, 1743-1751 (1991)
[20] Guédon, Y.: Review of several stochastic speech unit models. Computer speech and language 6, 377-402 (1992)
[21] Guédon, Y.: Computational methods for discrete hidden semi-Markov chains. Applied stochastic models in business and industry 15, 195-224 (1999)
[22] Huang, H. H.; Wang, B.: Integrated monitoring and diagnostic system for roller bearings. International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 12, No. 1, 37-46 (1996)
[23] Karimi, M.; Mokhtari, H.; Iravani, M. R.: Wavelet based on-line disturbance detection for power quality applications. IEEE transactions on power delivery 15, No. 4, 1212-1220 (2000)
[24] Kay, S. M.; Marple, S. L.: Spectrum analysis --- a modern perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE 69, No. 11, 1380-1419 (1991)
[25] Kuo, R.J., Chou C.L., 1993. Multi-sensor fusion based diagnosis for turbine blade faults via artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 1993 Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 805 -- 810.
[26] Levinson, S. E.: Continuously variable duration hidden Markov models for automatic speech recognition. Computer, speech and language 1, 29-45 (1986)
[27] Li, H. P.; Huang, Y. H.; Zhang, P. Y.: Research of electronic equipment fault diagnosis based on multisensor information fusion. Proceedings of the international symposium on test and measurement 4, 2775-2778 (2003)
[28] Liang, S. Y.; Dornfeld, D. A.: Tool wear detection using time series analysis of acoustic emission. Journal of engineering for industry 111, No. August, 199-205 (1989)
[29] Lippmann, R. P.: Introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP magazine (Acoustics, speech, and signal processing) 4, No. 2, 4-22 (1987)
[30] Liu, Q.; Wang, H. P.: A case study on multisensor data fusion for imbalance diagnosis of rotating machinery. Artificial intelligence for engineering design, analysis and manufacturing, AIEDAM 15, No. 3, 203-210 (2001) · Zbl 0972.68543
[31] Mathur, A.; Cavanaugh, K. F.; Pattipati, K. R.; Willett, P. K.; Galie, T. R.: Reasoning and modeling systems in diagnosis and prognosis. Proceedings of SPIE --- the international society for optical engineering 4389, 194-203 (2001)
[32] Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International journal of computer and information sciences 11, No. 5, 341-356 (1982) · Zbl 0501.68053
[33] Perrot, N.; Trystram, G.; Le Guennec, D.; Guely, F.: Sensor fusion for real time quality evaluation of biscuit during baking. Comparison between Bayesian and fuzzy approaches. Journal of food engineering 29, No. 3 -- 4, 301-315 (1996)
[34] Rabiner, L. R.: A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 77, No. 2, 257-286 (1989)
[35] Roemer, M.J., Kacprzynski, G.J., 2000. Advanced diagnostics and prognostics for gas turbine engine risk assessment. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, vol. 6, pp. 345 -- 354.
[36] Roemer, M.J., Kacprzynski, G.J., Schoeller, M.H., 2001a. Improved diagnostic and prognostic assessments using health management information fusion. In: AUTOTESTCON (Proceedings), pp. 365 -- 377.
[37] Roemer, M.J., Kacprzynski, G.J., Orsagh, R.F., 2001b. Assessment of data and knowledge fusion strategies for prognostics and health management. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, vol. 6, 2001, pp. 2979 -- 2988.
[38] Russell, M.J., Moore, R.K., 1985. Explicit modeling of state occupancy in hidden Markov models for automatic speech recognition. In: Proc. of ICASSP’85, Tampa, Florida, pp. 5 -- 8.
[39] Santoso, S.; Powers, E. J.; Grady, W. M.: Power quality disturbance data compression using wavelet transform methods. IEEE transaction on power delivery 12, No. 3, 1250-1256 (1997)
[40] Sarkar, T. K.; Su, C.: A tutorial on wavelets from an electrical engineering perspective, part II: The continuous case. IEEE antennas and propagation magazine 40, No. 6, 36-49 (1998)
[41] Shen, L.; Tay, E. H.; Qu, L.; Shen, Y.: Fault diagnosis using rough sets theory. Computers in industry 43, No. 1, 61-72 (2000)
[42] Sidahmed, M., 1989. Contribution of parametric signal processing techniques to machinery condition monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Machinery Monitoring and Diagnostics Conference and Exhibit, Las Vegas, NV, September 11 -- 14, pp. 190 -- 195.
[43] Silva, R. G.; Reuben, R. L.; Baker, K. J.; Wilcox, S. J.: Tool wear monitoring of turning operations by neural network and expert system classification of a feature set generated from multiple sensors. Mechanical systems & signal processing 12, No. 2, 319-332 (1998)
[44] Tay, E. H.; Shen, L.: Fault diagnosis based on rough set theory. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence 16, No. 1, 39-43 (2003)
[45] Vachtsevanos, G., Wang, P., 2001. Fault prognosis using dynamic wavelet neural networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE AUTOTESTCON, pp. 857 -- 870. · Zbl 0981.68510
[46] Varshney, P. K.: Multisensor data fusion. Electronics & communication engineering journal 9, No. 6, 245-253 (1997)
[47] Wang, L.; Mehrabi, M. G.; Jr., E. Kannatey-Asibu: Hidden Markov model-based tool wear monitoring in machining. ASME journal of manufacturing science and engineering 124, 651-658 (2002)