##
**Non-coaxial version of Rowe’s stress-dilatancy relation.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1178.74037

Summary: Non-coaxiality occurs when the directions of the principal plastic strain increments and the principal stresses deviate. Extensive experimental data have now conclusively shown that plastic flow in granular soils is non-coaxial particularly during loadings involving rotation of the principal stress directions. One way to integrate the effects of non-coaxiality is by modifying the expressions for energy dissipation and stress-dilatancy used in modeling plastic deformation of granular soils. In this regard, the paper’s main objective is to derive a non-coaxial version of Rowe’s stress-dilatancy relation, thereby making it more general and applicable to loadings involving principal stress rotation. The paper also applies Rowe’s non-coaxial stress-dilatancy equation in the determination of the effects of principal stress rotation in granular soils during simple shear loading conditions. Previous experimental data from simple shear tests on sand are used to validate the proposed non-coaxial version of Rowe’s stress-dilatancy relation.

### MSC:

74E20 | Granularity |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{M. Gutierrez} and \textit{J. Wang}, Granul. Matter 11, No. 2, 129--137 (2009; Zbl 1178.74037)

Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | Gutierrez M. and Ishihara K. (2000). Non-coaxiality and energy dissipation in granular materials. Soils Found. 40(2): 49–59 |

[2] | Vardoulakis I. and Georgopoulos I.G. (2005). The ”stress-dilatancy” hypothesis revisited: shearbanding related instabilities. Soils Found. 45(2): 61–76 |

[3] | Gutierrez M. and Vardoulakis I. (2006). Energy dissipation and post-bifurcation behavior of granular soils. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 31(3): 435–455 · Zbl 1196.74118 |

[4] | Rowe P.W. (1962). The Stress dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. 269: 500–527 |

[5] | Wan R.G. and Guo P.J. (2004). Stress dilatancy and fabric dependencies on sand behavior. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE. 13(6): 635–645 |

[6] | Nova, R., Wood, D.M.: A constitutive model for sand in triaxial compression. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 3(3), 255–278 (2005) |

[7] | Ling, H.I., Liu, H.: Pressure-level dependency and densification behavior of sand through generalized plasticity model. Eng. Mech. ASCE. 8, 851–860 (2003) |

[8] | McDowell G.R. (2002). A simple non-associated flow model for sand. Granul. Matter 4(2): 65–69 · Zbl 1049.76616 |

[9] | Schofield A. and Wroth C.P. (1967). Critical State Soil Mechanics. McGraw- Hill, London |

[10] | De Gennaro V. and Frank R. (2002). Elasto-plastic analysis of the interface behaviour between granular media and structure. Comp. Geotech. 29(7): 547–572 |

[11] | Ghionna V.N. and Mortara G. (2002). An elastoplastic model for sand-structure interface behaviour. Géotechnique 52(1): 41–50 · Zbl 1008.74520 |

[12] | Li X.S. and Dafalias Y.F. (2000). Dilatancy for cohesionless soils. Géotechnique 50(4): 449–460 |

[13] | Rowe P.W. (1969). The relation between the shear strength of sand in triaxial compression, plane strain and direct shear. Géotechnique 19(1): 75–86 |

[14] | de Jong D.J. (1976). Rowe’s stress-dilatancy relation based on friction. Géotechnique 26(3): 527–534 |

[15] | Niiseki, S.: Formulation of Rowe’s stress-dilatancy equation based on plane of maximum mobilization. Proceedings of Powders and Grains Conference, pp. 213–216 (2001) |

[16] | Oda M. and Konishi J. (1974). Microscopic deformation of granular material in simple shear. Soils Found. 14(4): 25–38 |

[17] | Oda M. (1975). On the relation \({\tau/\sigma_n=\kappa\tan\alpha}\) in the simple shear test Soils Found. 15(4): 35–41 |

[18] | Ochiai H. (1975). The behaviour of sand in the direct shear test (in Japanese). J. Jap. Soc. Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 15(4): 93–100 |

[19] | Cole, E.R.L.: The behavior of soils in the simple shear apparatus. Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University (1967) |

[20] | Gutierrez M., Ishihara K. and Towhata I. (1993). Flow theory for sand during rotation of principal stress direction. Soils Found. 31(4): 121–132 |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.