zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Random yield supply chain with a yield dependent secondary market. (English) Zbl 1188.90030
Summary: This paper considers a simple supply chain with one supplier and one retailer where the supplier’s production is subject to random yield and the retailer faces uncertain demand. There exists a secondary market for acquiring or disposing products by the supplier. We study both the centralized and decentralized systems. In the decentralized system, a no risk sharing contract and a risk sharing minimum commitment contract are analyzed. The supply chain with the risk sharing contract is further analyzed with a constant secondary market price and a yield dependent secondary market price. We present both the supplier’s and the retailer’s optimal strategies and provide insights for managers when making decisions under random yield risk and demand uncertainty. We find that the secondary market generally has a positive impact on supply chain performance and the actual effect of random yield risk on the supply chain performance depends on cost parameters and supply chain contract settings. Under certain conditions, reducing yield randomness may weaken the double marginalization effect and improve the chain performance. From the numerical study, we also show that there exists an optimal commitment level for the supply chain.

MSC:
90B06Transportation, logistics
WorldCat.org
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Arcelus, F.; Kumar, S.; Srinivasan, G.: Evaluating manufacturer’s buyback policies in a single-period two-echelon framework under price-dependent stochastic demand, Omega 36, No. 5, 808-824 (2008)
[2] Bassok, Y.; Anupindi, R.: Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment, IIE transaction 29, No. 5, 373-380 (1997)
[3] Cohen, E. J.; Yano, C. A.: Supplier commitment and production decisions uner a forecast-commitment contract, Management science 52, No. 1, 54-67 (2006)
[4] Erdem, A.; Ozekici, S.: Inventory models with random yield in a random environment, International journal of production economics 78, No. 3, 239-253 (2002)
[5] Gerchak, Y.: Order point/order quantity models with random yield, International journal of production economics 26, 297-298 (1992)
[6] Gerchak, Y.; Vickson, R. G.; Parlar, M.: Periodic review production models with variable yield and uncertain demand, IIE transaction 20, No. 2, 144-150 (1988)
[7] Gerchak, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yano, C.: Lot sizing in assembly systems with random component yields, IIE transaction 26, No. 2, 19-24 (1994)
[8] Granot, D.; Yin, S.: On sequential commitment in the price-dependent newsvendor model, European journal of operational research 177, No. 2, 939-968 (2007) · Zbl 1110.90049 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.013
[9] Guler, M.; Bilgic, T.: On coordinating an assembly system under random yield and random demand, European journal of operational research 196, No. 1, 342-350 (2009) · Zbl 1159.90309 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.002
[10] Gurnani, H.; Akella, R.; Lehoczky, J.: Supply management in assembly systems with random yield and random demand, IIE transaction 32, 701-714 (2000)
[11] Gurnani, H.; Gerchak, Y.: Coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields, European journal of operational research 176, No. 3, 1559-1576 (2007) · Zbl 1109.90004 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.036
[12] Haksoz, C.; Seshadri, S.: Supply chain operations in the presence of a spot market: A review with discussion, The journal of the operational research society 58, No. 11, 1412-1429 (2007) · Zbl 1156.90393 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602401
[13] He, Y.; Zhang, J.: Random yield risk sharing in a two-level supply chain, International journal of production economics 112, No. 2, 769-781 (2008)
[14] Henig, M.; Gerchak, Y.: The structure of periodic review policies in the presence of random yield, Operations research 38, No. 4, 634-643 (1990) · Zbl 0721.90034 · doi:10.1287/opre.38.4.634
[15] Kouvelis, P.; Gutierrez, G.: The newsvendor problem in a global market: optimal centralized and decentralized control policies for a two-market stochastic inventory system, Management science 43, No. 5, 571-585 (1997) · Zbl 0890.90083 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.5.571
[16] Lee, H.; Whang, S.: The impact of the secondary market on the supply chain, Management science 48, No. 6, 719-731 (2002) · Zbl 1232.90070 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.6.719.189
[17] Ozer, O.; Wei, W.: Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information, Management science 52, No. 8, 1238-1257 (2006)
[18] Piramuthu, S.: Knowledge-based framework for automated dynamic supply chain configuration, European journal of operational research 165, No. 1, 219-230 (2005) · Zbl 1112.90303 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.12.023
[19] Tibben-Lembke, R. S.: N-period contract with ordering constraints and total minimum commitments: optimal and heuristic solutions, European journal of operational research 156, No. 2, 353-374 (2004) · Zbl 1056.90007 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00121-8
[20] Wang, Y.; Gerchak, Y.: Periodic review production models with variable capacity, random yield, and uncertain demand, Management science 42, No. 1, 130-137 (1996) · Zbl 0851.90059 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.1.130
[21] Wu, J.: Quantity flexibility contracts under Bayesian updating, Computers and operations research 32, No. 5, 1267-1288 (2005) · Zbl 1075.90043 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2003.11.004
[22] Yano, C.; Lee, H.: Lot sizing with random yields: A review, Operations research 43, No. 2, 311-334 (1995) · Zbl 0832.90031 · doi:10.1287/opre.43.2.311