×

Using decision rules to achieve mass customization of airline services. (English) Zbl 1188.90155

Summary: This paper uses the Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA) to formulate airline service strategies by generating decision rules that model passenger preference for airline service quality. DRSA could help airlines eliminate some services associated with dispensable attributes without affecting passenger perception of service quality. DRSA could also help airlines achieve mass customization of airline services and generate additional revenues by active or passive targeting of quality services to passengers.

MSC:

90B90 Case-oriented studies in operations research
90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Blaszczynski, J.; Greco, S.; Slowinski, R., Multi-criteria classification - A new scheme for application of dominance-based decision rules, European journal of operational research, 181, 3, 1030-1044, (2007) · Zbl 1121.90073
[2] Chang, Y.H.; Yeh, C.H., A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines, European journal of operational research, 139, 1, 166-177, (2002) · Zbl 1008.90513
[3] Chen, F.Y.; Chang, Y.H., Examining airline service quality from a process perspective, Journal of air transport management, 11, 2, 79-87, (2005)
[4] Fortemps, P.; Greco, S.; Slowinski, Multicriteria decision support using rules that represent rough-graded preference relations, European journal of operational research, 188, 1, 206-223, (2008) · Zbl 1135.90019
[5] Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R., A new rough set approach to evaluation of bankruptcy risk, (), 121-136
[6] Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R., Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis, European journal of operation research, 129, 1, 1-47, (2001) · Zbl 1008.91016
[7] Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R.; Stefanowski, J., An algorithm for induction of decision rules consistent with dominance principle, (), 304-313 · Zbl 1014.68545
[8] Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R., Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria, European journal of operational research, 138, 2, 247-259, (2002) · Zbl 1008.90509
[9] Gronroos, C., Service management and marketing: managing the moments of truth in service competition, (1990), Free Press, Lexington Books Lexington, MA
[10] Gronroos, C., Quality comes to service, (), 17-24
[11] Gursoy, D.; Chen, M.H.; Kim, H.Y., The US airlines relative positioning based on attributes of service quality, Tourism management, 26, 1, 57-67, (2005)
[12] Kotlowski, W.; Dembczynski, K.; Greco, S.; Slowinski, R., Stochastic dominance-based rough set model for ordinal classification, Information sciences, 178, 21, 4019-4037, (2008) · Zbl 1173.68734
[13] Liou, J.H. James; Tzeng, G.H., A non-additive model for evaluating airline service quality, Journal of air transport management, 13, 3, 131-138, (2007)
[14] Lu, J.L.; Ling, F.I., Cross-cultural perspectives regarding service quality and satisfaction in Chinese cross-strait airlines, Journal of air transport management, 14, 1, 16-19, (2008)
[15] Mazanec, J.A., Positioning analysis with self-organization maps: an exploratory study on luxury hotels, The cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly, 31, 2, 84-91, (1995)
[16] Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L., A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research, Journal of marketing, 49, 4, 41-50, (1985)
[17] Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L., SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality, Journal of retailing, 64, 1, 12-40, (1988)
[18] Park, J.W.; Robertson, R.; Wu, C.L., The effect of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioral intentions: A Korean case study, Journal of air transport management, 10, 6, 435-439, (2004)
[19] Pawlak, Z., Rough sets, International journal of computer and information science, 11, 5, 341-356, (1982) · Zbl 0501.68053
[20] Pawlak, Z., Rough sets, Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data, (1991), Kluwer Dordrecht · Zbl 0758.68054
[21] Pawlak, Z., Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support, European journal of operational research, 99, 1, 48-57, (1997) · Zbl 0923.90004
[22] Sai, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhong, N., Data analysis and mining in ordered information tables, Icdm, 2001, 497-504, (2001)
[23] Sim, K.L.; Koh, H.C.; Shetty, S., Some potential issues of service quality reporting for airlines, Journal of air transport management, 12, 6, 293-299, (2006)
[24] Slowinski, R.; Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B., Rough set based decision support, (), 475-527, (Chapter 16)
[25] Slowinski, R., 2006. The international summer school on MCDM 2006. Class note. Kainan University, Taiwan. Software available on line:
[26] Tsaur, S.H.; Chang, T.Y.; Yeh, C.H., The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM, Tourism management, 23, 2, 107-115, (2002)
[27] Yao, Y., Zhou, B., Chen, Y., 2007. Interpreting low and high order rules: A granular computing approach. In: Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms, International Conference, RSEISP 2007, LNAI 4585, pp. 371-380.
[28] Yao, Y.; Zhao, Y., Attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models, Information science, 178, 17, 3356-3373, (2008) · Zbl 1156.68589
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.