zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Trading quantization precision for update rates for systems with limited communication in the uplink channel. (English) Zbl 1194.93122
Summary: In many situations, control applications have to exchange information through limited bandwidth communication channels, which affect their behavior. For that reason, there is a strong need for methods that maximize the relevancy of the exchanged control signals. In general, increasing control signals’ update frequency improves the disturbance rejection abilities whereas increasing their quantization precision improves the steady state performance. However, when the bandwidth is limited, increasing the update frequency necessitates the reduction of the quantization precision and vice versa. Motivated by these observations, and focusing on the uplink bandwidth limitations, an approach for the dynamical online state feedback assignment of control inputs’ quantization precision and update rate is proposed. This approach, which is based on the model predictive control technique, enables us to choose the update rate and the quantization levels of control signals from a predefined set, in order to optimize the control performance. Practical stability properties of the approach are then studied. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated on a simulation example.

MSC:
93C55Discrete-time control systems
93D05Lyapunov and other classical stabilities of control systems
WorldCat.org
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Ben Gaid, M. -M., & Çela, A. (2006). Trading quantization precision for sampling rates in networked systems with limited communication. In Proc. 45th IEEE conf. on decision and control, San Diego, USA (pp. 1135-1140).
[2] Ben Gaid, M. -M., & Çela, A. (2009). Trading quantization precision for sampling rates in systems with limited communication in the uplink channel. Technical report TR-1- 06/2009. Available online on http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00405670/. Embedded Systems Department, ESIEE Paris, University of Paris East.
[3] Ben Gaid, M. -M.; Çela, A.; Hamam, Y.: Optimal integrated control and scheduling of networked control systems with communication constraints: application to a car suspension system, IEEE transactions on control systems technology 14, No. 4, 776-787 (2006)
[4] Blanchini, F.: Set invariance in control, Automatica 35, No. 11, 1747-1767 (1999) · Zbl 0935.93005 · doi:10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00113-2
[5] Brockett, R. W. (1995). Stabilization of motor networks. In Proc. 34th IEEE conf. on decision and control, New Orleans, USA (pp. 1484-1488).
[6] Delchamps, D. F.: Stabilizing a linear system with quantized state feedback, IEEE transactions on automatic control 35, No. 8, 916-924 (1990) · Zbl 0719.93067 · doi:10.1109/9.58500
[7] Elia, N.; Mitter, S. K.: Stabilization of linear systems with limited information, IEEE transactions on automatic control 46, No. 9, 1384-1400 (2001) · Zbl 1059.93521 · doi:10.1109/9.948466 · http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/wrapper.jsp?arnumber=948466
[8] Fagnani, F.; Zampieri, S.: Quantized stabilization of linear systems: complexity versus performance, IEEE transactions on automatic control 49, No. 9, 1534-1548 (2004)
[9] Georgiev, D.; Tilbury, D.: Packet-based control: the H2-optimal solution, Automatica 42, No. 1, 137-144 (2006) · Zbl 1136.93336 · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2005.08.011
[10] Goodwin, G. C.; Haimovich, H.; Quevedo, D. E.; Welsh, J. S.: A moving horizon approach to networked control systems design, IEEE transactions on automatic control 49, No. 9, 1562-1572 (2004)
[11] Gupta, V., Dana, A. F., Murray, R. M., & Hassibi, B. (2006). On the effect of quantization on performance. In Proc. 2006 American control conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA (pp. 1364-1369).
[12] Heemels, M., Nesic, D., Teel, A. R., & Van De Wouw, N. (2009). Networked and quantized control systems with communication delays. In Proc. 48th IEEE conf. on Decision and Control, Shanghai, China.
[13] Hespanha, J. P.; Naghshtabrizi, P.; Yonggang, X.: A survey of recent results in networked control systems, Proceedings of the IEEE 95, No. 1 (2007)
[14] Kolmanovsky, I.; Gilbert, E. G.: Theory and computation of disturbance invariant sets for discrete-time linear systems, Mathematical problems in engineering 4, No. 4, 317-367 (1998) · Zbl 0923.93005 · doi:10.1155/S1024123X98000866
[15] Lemmon, M. D., & Ling, Q. (2004). Control system performance under dynamic quantization : the scalar case. In Proc. 43rd IEEE conf. on decision and control, Paradise Island, Bahamas (pp. 1884-1888).
[16] Rakovic, S. V.; Kerrigan, E. C.; Kouramas, K. I.; Mayne, D. Q.: Invariant approximations of the minimal robust positively invariant set, IEEE transactions on automatic control 50, No. 3, 406-410 (2005)
[17] Verriest, E., & Egerstedt, M. (2003). Control with delayed and limited information: a first look. In Proc. 42nd IEEE conf. on decision and control, Hawaii, USA(pp. 1231-1236).