zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. (English) Zbl 1200.91173
Summary: This paper models knowledge diffusion as a barter process in which agents exchange different types of knowledge. This is intended to capture the observed practice of informal knowledge trading. Agents are located on a network and are directly connected with a small number of other agents. Agents repeatedly meet those with whom direct connections exist and trade if mutually profitable trades exist. In this way knowledge diffuses throughout the economy. We examine the relationship between network architecture and diffusion performance. We consider the space of structures that fall between, at one extreme, a network in which every agent is connected to $n$ nearest neighbours, and at the other extreme a network with each agent being connected to, on average, $n$ randomly chosen agents. We find that the performance of the system exhibits clear “small world” properties, in that the steady-state level of average knowledge is maximal when the structure is a small world (that is, when most connections are local, but roughly 10 percent of them are long distance). The variance of knowledge levels among agents is maximal in the small world region, whereas the coefficient of variation is minimal. We explain these results as reflecting the dynamics of knowledge transmission as affected by the architecture of connections among agents.

MSC:
91B44Informational economics
90B18Communication networks (optimization)
05C82Small world graphs, complex networks (graph theory)
91B72Spatial models in economics
WorldCat.org
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Allen, B.: Some stochastic processes of interdependent demand and technological diffusion of an innovation exhibiting externalities among adopters. International economic review 23, 595-608 (1982) · Zbl 0518.90012
[2] An, M.; Kiefer, N.: Local externalities and societal adoption of technologies. Journal of evolutionary economics 5, 103-117 (1993)
[3] Anderlini, L.; Ianni, A.: Path dependence and learning from neighbors. Games and economic behavior 13, 141-177 (1996) · Zbl 0851.90148
[4] Bala, V.; Goyal, S.: Learning from neighbours. Review of economic studies 65, 595-621 (1998) · Zbl 0910.90103
[5] Bala, V.; Goyal, S.: A non-cooperative model of network formation. Econometrica 68, 1181-1229 (2000) · Zbl 1022.91047
[6] Bala, V.; Goyal, S.: Conformism and diversity under social learning. Economic theory 17, 101-120 (2001) · Zbl 1038.91555
[7] Chwe, M. S-Y.: Structure and strategy in collective action. American journal of sociology 105, 128-156 (1999)
[8] Chwe, M. S-Y.: Communication and coordination in social networks. Review of economic studies 67, 1-16 (2000) · Zbl 0956.91012
[9] Cohen, W.; Levinthal, D.: Innovation and learningthe two faces of R&D. The economic journal 99, 569-596 (1989)
[10] Cohen, W.; Levinthal, D.: Absorptive capacitiesa new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly 35, 128-152 (1990)
[11] Cowan, R.; Foray, D.: Quandaries in the economics of dual technologies and spillovers from military to civilian research and development. Research policy 24, 851-868 (1997)
[12] David, P.; Foray, D.; Dalle, J. -M.: Marshallian externalities and the emergence and spatial stability of technological enclaves. Economics of innovation and new technology 6, 147-183 (1998)
[13] Durlauf, S.: Multiple equilibria and persistence in aggregate fluctuations. American economic review P&P 81, 70-74 (1991)
[14] Durlauf, S.: Non-ergodic economic growth. Review of economic studies 60, 349-366 (1993) · Zbl 0774.90017
[15] Eaton, B. C.; Eswaran, M.: Technology-trading coalitions in supergames. RAND journal of economics 28, 135-149 (1997)
[16] Feldman, M.: The geography of innovation. (1994)
[17] Föllmer, H.: Random economies with many interacting agents. Journal of mathematical economics 1, 51-62 (1974) · Zbl 0281.90021
[18] Gambardella, A., Garcia-Fontes, W., 1996. European research funding and regional technological capabilities: network composition analysis, Department of Economics and Business, Pompeu Fabra University, Working Paper 174.
[19] Glaeser, E.; Sacerdote, B.; Scheinkman, J.: Crime and social interaction. Quarterly journal of economics 111, 507-548 (1996)
[20] Goyal, S.; Janssen, M.: Interaction structure and social change. Journal of institutional and theoretical economics 152, 472-495 (1996)
[21] Goyal, S.; Moraga-Gonzáles, J. L.: R&D networks. Rand journal of economics 32, 686-707 (2001)
[22] Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology 78, 1360-1380 (1973)
[23] Hedström, P.: Contagious collectivitieson the spatial diffusion of swedish trade unions 1890--1940. American journal of sociology 99, 1157-1179 (1994)
[24] Hicks, D.: Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and corporate change 4, 401-424 (1995)
[25] Ioannides, Y.: Trading uncertainty and market form. International economic review 31, 619-633 (1990) · Zbl 0701.90011
[26] Jackson, M.; Dutta, B.: On the formation of networks and groups. Models of the strategic formation of networks and groups (2001)
[27] Jackson, M. O.; Wolinsky, A.: A strategic model of social and economic networks. Journal of economic theory 71, 44-74 (1996) · Zbl 0871.90144
[28] Jaffe, A.; Tratjenberg, M.; Henderson, R.: Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly journal of economics 63, 577-598 (1993)
[29] Kirman, A. P.: Communication in marketsa suggested approach. Economics letters 12, 101-108 (1983) · Zbl 1273.91217
[30] Kirman, A. P.: The economy as an interactive system. The economy as an evolving complex system II, 491-531 (1998)
[31] Midgley, D.; Morrison, D.; Roberts, J.: The effect of network structure in industrial diffusion processes. Research policy 21, 533-552 (1992)
[32] Milgram, S.: The small world problem. Psychology today 2, 60-67 (1967)
[33] Morris, S.: Contagion. Review of economic studies 67, 57-78 (2000) · Zbl 0960.91016
[34] Pake, G. E.: Business payoff from basic research at xerox. Research management 29, 35-40 (1986)
[35] Prevezer, M.; Swann, P.: A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology. Research policy 25, 1139-1157 (1996)
[36] Rosenberg, N.: Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?. Research policy 19, 165-174 (1990)
[37] Rosenberg, N.; Nelson, R.: American universities and technical advance in industry. Research policy 23, 323-348 (1994)
[38] Schrader, S.: Informal technology transfer between firmscooperation through information trading. Research policy 20, 153-170 (1991)
[39] Von Hippel, E.: Cooperation between rivalsinformal know-how trading. Research policy 16, 291-302 (1987)
[40] Watts, D.; Strogatz, S.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Letters to nature 393, 440-442 (1998)
[41] Weisbuch, G.; Kirman, A.; Herreiner, D.: Market organization and trading relationships. Economic journal 110, 411-436 (2000)
[42] Young, P. H.: Individual strategy and social structure. (1998)