×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Using the method of invariant ellipsoids for linear robust output stabilization of spacecraft. (English. Russian original) Zbl 1229.93138
Autom. Remote Control 72, No. 3, 540-555 (2011); translation from Avtom. Telemekh. 2011, No. 3, 81-97 (2011).
Summary: Consideration is given to the problem of robust output stabilization of the nonlinear system using the method of invariant ellipsoids assuming that the system satisfies a Lipschitz-like condition and the system output is subjected to bounded external disturbances. It is reduced to a special optimization problem with solution based on the theory of linear matrix inequalities. The proposed approach is illustrated by an example of stabilization of a spacecraft with elastic dynamic elements. The designed control represents a combination of the “accelerate-decelerate” algorithm and a linear feedback obtained using the method of invariant ellipsoids.

MSC:
93D21 Adaptive or robust stabilization
93C10 Nonlinear systems in control theory
93B51 Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.)
93C15 Control/observation systems governed by ordinary differential equations
Software:
PENBMI
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Bertsekas, D.P. and Rhodes, I.B., On the Minmax Reachability of Target Set and Target Tubes, Automatica, 1971, vol. 7, pp. 233–247. · Zbl 0215.21801
[2] Bertsekas, D.P., Infinite-time Reachability of State-Space Regions by Using Feedback Control, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1972, vol. 17, pp. 604–613. · Zbl 0264.93011
[3] Glover, D. and Schweppe, F., Control of Linear Dynamic Systems with Set Constrained Disturbances, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1971, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 411–423.
[4] Kurzhanski, A. and Valyi, I., Ellipsoidal Calculus for Estimation and Control, Boston: Birkhauser, 1997.
[5] Francis, B.A., Helton, J.W., and Zames, G., H-Optimal Feedback Controllers for Linear Multivariable Systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1984, vol. AC-29, pp. 888–900. · Zbl 0572.93021
[6] Doyle, J.C., Synthesis of Robust Controllers and Filters, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Control, 1983, pp. 109–114.
[7] Barabanov, A.E. and Granichin, O.N., Optimal Controller for a Linear Plant with Bounded Noise, Autom. Remote Control, 1984, no. 5, pp. 578–585. · Zbl 0561.93027
[8] Vidyasagar, M., Optimal Rejection of Persistent Bounded Disturbances, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1986, vol. 31, pp. 527–534. · Zbl 0594.93050
[9] Dahleh, M.A. and Pearson, J.B., l 1 Optimal Feedback Controllers for MIMO Discrete-time Systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1987, vol. 32, pp. 314–322. · Zbl 0622.93041
[10] Nagpal, K., Abedor, J., and Poolla, K., An LMI Approach to Peak-to-Peak Gain Minimization: Filtering and Control, in Proc. Am. Control Conf., 1994, pp. 742–746.
[11] Abedor, J., Nagpal, K., and Poola, K., A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach to Peak-to-Peak Gain Minimization, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 1996, vol. 6, pp. 899–927. · Zbl 0862.93028
[12] Boyd, S., Ghaoui, E., Feron, E., and Balakrishnan, V., Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, Philadelphia: SIAM, 1994. · Zbl 0816.93004
[13] Blanchini, F., Set Invariance in Control-A Survey, Automatica, 1999, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1747–1767. · Zbl 0935.93005
[14] Blanchini, F. and Miani, S., Set Theoretic Methods in Control. Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Boston: Birkhauser, 2007. · Zbl 1140.93001
[15] Polyak, B.T., Nazin, A.V., Topunov, M.V., and Nazin, S.A., Rejection of Bounded Disturbances via Invariant Ellipsoids Technique, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Control, 2006, pp. 1429–1434. · Zbl 1125.93370
[16] Nazin, S.A., Polyak, B.T., and Topunov, M.V., Rejection of Bounded Exogenous Disturbances by the Method of Invariant Ellipsoids, Autom. Remote Control, 2007, no. 3, pp. 467–486. · Zbl 1125.93370
[17] Polyak, B.T. and Topunov, M.V., Suppression of Bounded Exogenous Disturbances: Output Feedback, Autom. Remote Control, 2008, no. 5, pp. 801–818. · Zbl 1156.93338
[18] Polyak, B.T., Shcherbakov, P.S., and Topunov, M.V., Invariant Ellipsoids Approach to Robust Rejection of Persistent Disturbances, in Proc. World Congress, IFAC, 2008, pp. 3976–3981.
[19] Safonov, M.G., Goh, K.C., and Ly, J.H., Control System Synthesis via Bilinear Matrix Inequalities, in Proc. Am. Control Conf., 1994, pp. 45–49.
[20] Toker, O. and Ozbay, H., On the NP-hardness of Solving Bilinear Matrix Inequalities and Simultaneous Stabilization with Static Output Feedback, in Proc. Am. Control Conf., 1995, pp. 2525–2526.
[21] Xiao, Y., Crusca, F., and Chu, E., Bilinear Matrix Inequalities in Robust Control: Phase I-Problem Formulation, Technical Report TR-96-3, Monash Univ., Dept. of Electrical & Computer Systems Eng., Melbourne, Australia, 1996.
[22] Loefberg, J., Minimax Approaches to Robust Model Predictive Control, PhD Dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linkoeping University, 2003.
[23] Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L., Semidefinite Programming Relaxations of Non-Convex Problems in Control and Combinatorial Optimization, in Communications, Computation, Control and Signal Processing: A Tribute to Thomas Kailath, 1997, pp. 279–288.
[24] Henrion, D., Loefberg, J., Kocvara, M., and Stingl, M., Solving Polynomial Static Output Feedback Problems with PENBMI, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Control, 2006, pp. 7581–7586.
[25] Yefremov, M.S., Polyakov, A.Y., and Strygin, V.V., An Algorithm for the Active Stabilization of a Spacecraft with Viscoelastic Elements Under Conditions of Uncertainty, J. Appl. Math. Mechanics, 2006, pp. 723–733.
[26] Poznyak, A.S., Advanced Mathematical Tools for Automatic Control Engineers: Deterministic Techniques, New York: Elsevier, 2008.
[27] Kirk, D.E., Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1970.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.