“Bricks vs. Clicks”: the impact of manufacturer encroachment with a dealer leasing and selling of durable goods. (English) Zbl 1244.90051

Summary: In durable goods markets, many brand name manufacturers, including IBM, HP, Epson, and Lenovo, have adopted dual-channel supply chains to market their products. There is scant literature, however, addressing the product durability and its impact on players’ optimal strategies in a dual-channel supply chain. To fill this void, we consider a two-period dual-channel model in which a manufacturer sells a durable product directly through both a manufacturer-owned e-channel and an independent dealer who adopts a mix of selling and leasing to consumers. Our results show that the manufacturer begins encroaching into the market in Period 1, but the dealer starts withdrawing from the retail channel in Period 2. Moreover, as the direct selling cost decreases, the equilibrium quantities and wholesale prices become quite angular and often nonmonotonic. Among other results, we find that both the dealer and the supply chain may benefit from the manufacturer’s encroachment. Our results also indicate that both the market structure and the nature of competition have an important impact on the player’s (dealer’s) optimal choice of leasing and selling.


90B06 Transportation, logistics and supply chain management
90B60 Marketing, advertising
91A80 Applications of game theory
Full Text: DOI


[1] Agatz, N. A.H.; Fleischmann, M.; van Nunen, J. A.E. E., E-fulfillment and multi-channel distribution - a review, European Journal of Operational Research, 187, 2, 339-356 (2008) · Zbl 1147.90020
[2] Arya, A.; Mittendorf, B.; Sappington, D. E.M., The bright side of supplier encroachment, Marketing Science, 26, 5, 651-659 (2007)
[3] Balasubramanian, S., Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers, Marketing Science, 17, 3, 181-195 (1998)
[4] Bhaskaran, S. R.; Gilbert, S. M., Implications of channel structure for leasing or selling durable goods, Marketing Science, 28, 5, 918-934 (2009)
[5] Boyaci, T., Competitive stocking and coordination in a multiple-channel distribution system, IIE Transactions, 37, 5, 407-427 (2005)
[6] Bucovetsky, S.; Chilton, J., Concurrent renting and selling in a durable-goods monopoly under threat of entry, Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 2, 261-275 (1986)
[7] Bulow, J. I., Durable-goods monopolists, The Journal of Political Economy, 90, 2, 314-332 (1982)
[8] Cachon, G. P.; Lariviere, M. A., Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations, Management Science, 51, 1, 30-44 (2005) · Zbl 1232.90173
[9] Cai, G., Channel selection and coordination in dual-channel supply chains, Journal of Retailing, 86, 1, 22-36 (2010)
[10] Caldieraro, F.; Coughlan, A. T., Spiffed-up channels: The role of spiffs in hierarchical selling organizations, Marketing Science, 26, 1, 31-51 (2007)
[11] Chen, K. Y.; Kaya, M.; Ozer, O., Dual sales channel management with service competition, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 10, 4, 654-675 (2008)
[12] Chiang, W. Y.K.; Chhajed, D.; Hess, J. D., Direct-marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design, Management Science, 49, 1, 1-20 (2003) · Zbl 1232.90231
[13] Chun, S. H.; Rhee, B. D.; Park, S. Y.; Kim, J. C., Emerging dual channel system and manufacturer’s direct retail channel strategy, International Review of Economics and Finance, 20, 4, 812-825 (2011)
[14] Desai, P. S.; Purohit, D., Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm, Management Science, 44, 11, S19-S34 (1998) · Zbl 0989.90533
[15] Desai, P. S.; Purohit, D., Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling, Marketing Science, 18, 1, 42-58 (1999)
[16] Hua, G.; Wang, S.; Cheng, T. C.E., Price and lead time decisions in dual-channel supply chains, European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 1, 113-126 (2010) · Zbl 1188.90010
[17] Janah, M., 1999. Tech firms slow to use direct Web sales. San Jose Mercury News (February 24) C1. <http://www.wsj.com>; Janah, M., 1999. Tech firms slow to use direct Web sales. San Jose Mercury News (February 24) C1. <http://www.wsj.com>
[18] Jeuland, A. P.; Shugan, S. M., Managing channel profits, Marketing Science, 27, 1, 49-51 (2008)
[19] Li, X.; Wang, Q., Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems, European Journal of Operational Research, 179, 1, 1-16 (2007) · Zbl 1161.90309
[20] Narisetti, R., IBM plans to sell some gear directly to fight its rivals, Wall Street Journal, June 5 (1998)
[21] Poddar, S., Strategic choice in durable goods market when firms move simultaneously, Research in Economics, 58, 2, 175-186 (2004)
[22] Purohit, D., Marketing channels and the durable goods monopolist: Renting versus selling reconsidered, Journal of Economics Management Strategy, 4, 1, 69-84 (1995)
[23] Purohit, D.; Staelin, R., Rentals, sales, and buybacks: Managing secondary distribution channels, Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 3, 325-338 (1994)
[24] Saggi, K.; Vettas, N., Leasing versus selling and firm efficiency in oligopoly, Economics Letters, 66, 361-368 (2000) · Zbl 0948.91032
[25] Spengler, J. J., Vertical integration and antitrust policy, Journal of Political Economy, 58, 4, 347-352 (1950)
[26] Stokey, N. L., Rational expectations and durable goods pricing, The Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 1, 112-128 (1981)
[27] Tsay, A. A.; Agrawal, N., Channel conflict and coordination in the e-commerce age, Production and Operations Management, 13, 1, 93-110 (2004)
[28] Webb, K. L.; Lambe, C. J., Internal multi-channel conflict: An exploratory investigation and conceptual framework, Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 1, 29-43 (2007)
[29] Yan, R., Managing channel coordination in a multi-channel manufacturer-retailer supply chain, Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 4, 636-642 (2011)
[30] Yao, D. Q.; Liu, J. J., Competitive pricing of mixed retail and e-tail distribution channels, Omega - International Journal of Management Science, 33, 3, 235-247 (2005)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.