Pirali, H.; Djavanroodi, F.; Haghpanahi, M. Combined visibility and surrounding triangles method for simulation of crack discontinuities in meshless methods. (English) Zbl 1264.74257 J. Appl. Math. 2012, Article ID 715613, 16 p. (2012). Summary: In this paper a combined node searching algorithm for simulation of crack discontinuities in meshless methods called combined visibility and surrounding triangles (CVT) is proposed. The element free Galerkin (EFG) method is employed for stress analysis of cracked bodies. The proposed node searching algorithm is based on the combination of surrounding triangles and visibility methods; the surrounding triangles method is used for support domains of nodes and quadrature points generated at the vicinity of crack faces and the visibility method is used for points located on the crack faces. In comparison with the conventional methods, such as the visibility, the transparency, and the diffraction method, this method is simpler with reasonable efficiency. To show the performance of this method, linear elastic fracture mechanics analyses are performed on number of standard test specimens and stress intensity factors are calculated. It is shown that the results are in good agreement with the exact solution and with those generated by the finite element method (FEM). Cited in 3 Documents MSC: 74R99 Fracture and damage 74S05 Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics 65M60 Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs PDF BibTeX XML Cite \textit{H. Pirali} et al., J. Appl. Math. 2012, Article ID 715613, 16 p. (2012; Zbl 1264.74257) Full Text: DOI References: [1] G. R. Liu, Mesh Free Methods, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1st edition, 2003. · Zbl 1243.62131 [2] T. N. Bittencourt, P. A. Wawrzynek, A. R. Ingraffea, and J. L. Sousa, “Quasi-automatic simulation of crack propagation for 2D lefm problems,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 321-334, 1996. [3] P. O. Bouchard, F. Bay, and Y. Chastel, “Numerical modelling of crack propagation: automatic remeshing and comparison of different criteria,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 192, no. 35-36, pp. 3887-3908, 2003. · Zbl 1054.74724 [4] S. R. Beissel, G. R. Johnson, and C. H. Popelar, “An element-failure algorithm for dynamic crack propagation in general directions,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 61, no. 3-4, pp. 407-425, 1998. [5] F. R. Biglari, A. T. Kermani, M. H. Parsa, K. M. Nikbin, and N. P. O’Dowd, “Comparison of fine and conventional blanking based on ductile fracture criteria,” in Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, pp. 265-270, Manchester, UK, July 2004. [6] Y. T. Gu and L. C. Zhang, “Coupling of the meshfree and finite element methods for determination of the crack tip fields,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 986-1004, 2008. [7] T. Rabczuk, S. Bordas, and G. Zi, “On three-dimensional modelling of crack growth using partition of unity methods,” Computers and Structures, vol. 88, no. 23-24, pp. 1391-1411, 2010. [8] S. E. Mousavi and N. Sukumar, “Generalized Gaussian quadrature rules for discontinuities and crack singularities in the extended finite element method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 199, no. 49-52, pp. 3237-3249, 2010. · Zbl 1225.74099 [9] I. V. Singh, B. K. Mishra, S. Bhattacharya, and R. U. Patil, “The numerical simulation of fatigue crack growth using extended finite element method,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 109-119, 2012. [10] P. H. Wen and M. H. Aliabadi, “A variational approach for evaluation of stress intensity factors using the element free Galerkin method,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 48, no. 7-8, pp. 1171-1179, 2011. · Zbl 1236.74093 [11] T. P. Fries and H. G. Matthies, Classification and Overview of Meshfree Methods, Informatikbericht 2003-3, Technical University Braunschweig, Brunswick, Germany, 2003. · Zbl 1354.76131 [12] V. P. Nguyen, T. Rabczuk, S. Bordas, and M. Duflot, “Meshless methods: a review and computer implementation aspects,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 763-813, 2008. · Zbl 1152.74055 [13] T. Belytschko, Y. Krongauz, M. Fleming, D. Organ, and W. K. S. Liu, “Smoothing and accelerated computations in the element free Galerkin method,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 74, no. 1-2, pp. 111-126, 1996. · Zbl 0862.73058 [14] Y. Krongauz and T. Belytschko, “EFG approximation with discontinuous derivatives,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1215-1233, 1998. · Zbl 0906.73063 [15] D. Organ, M. Fleming, T. Terry, and T. Belytschko, “Continuous meshless approximations for nonconvex bodies by diffraction and transparency,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 225-235, 1996. · Zbl 0864.73076 [16] B. Muravin and E. Turkel, Advance Diffraction Method as a Tool for Solution of Complex Non-Convex Boundary Problems in Meshfree Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 26, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2002, Edited by M. Griebel, M. A. Schweitzer. · Zbl 1090.74701 [17] M. Fleming, Y. A. Chu, B. Moran, and T. Belytschko, “Enriched element-free Galerkin methods for crack tip fields,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1483-1504, 1997. [18] G. Ventura, J. X. Xu, and T. Belytschko, “A vector level set method and new discontinuity approximations for crack growth by EFG,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 923-944, 2002. · Zbl 1034.74053 [19] T. Rabczuk and T. Belytschko, “Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 61, no. 13, pp. 2316-2343, 2004. · Zbl 1075.74703 [20] T. Rabczuk, P. M. A. Areias, and T. Belytschko, “A simplified mesh-free method for shear bands with cohesive surfaces,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 993-1021, 2007. · Zbl 1194.74536 [21] A. Carpinteri, “Post-peak and post-bifurcation analysis of cohesive crack propagation,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 265-278, 1989. [22] A. Carpinteri, “A scale-invariant cohesive crack model for quasi-brittle materials,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 207-217, 2001. [23] H. Tada, P. C. Paris, and G. R. Irwin, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Del Research, Hellrtown, Pa, USA, 1975. [24] S. Hagihara, M. Tsunori, T. Ikeda, and N. Miyazaki, “Application of meshfree method to elastic-plastic fracture mechanics parameter analysis,” Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 63-72, 2007. · Zbl 1184.74058 [25] T. Belytschko, Y. Y. Lu, and L. Gu, “Element-free Galerkin methods,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 229-256, 1994. · Zbl 0796.73077 [26] P. Krysl and T. Belytschko, “Element-free Galerkin method: convergence of the continuous and discontinuous shape functions,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 148, no. 3-4, pp. 257-277, 1997. · Zbl 0918.73125 [27] T. L. Anderson, Fracture Mechanics, Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd edition, 1995. · Zbl 0999.74001 [28] A. Saxena, Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics for Engineers, 1998. · Zbl 0902.73002 This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.