##
**A simple numerical method for pricing an American put option.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1266.91104

Summary: We present a simple numerical method to find the optimal exercise boundary in an American put option. We formulate an intermediate function with the fixed free boundary that has Lipschitz character near optimal exercise boundary. Employing it, we can easily determine the optimal exercise boundary by solving a quadratic equation in time-recursive way. We also present several numerical results which illustrate a comparison to other methods.

### MSC:

91G20 | Derivative securities (option pricing, hedging, etc.) |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{B. J. Kim} et al., J. Appl. Math. 2013, Article ID 128025, 7 p. (2013; Zbl 1266.91104)

Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | F. Black and M. Scholes, “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 637-659, 1973. · Zbl 1092.91524 |

[2] | R. C. Merton, “Theory of rational option pricing,” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol. 4, pp. 141-183, 1973. · Zbl 1257.91043 |

[3] | H. P. McKean, “Appendix: a free boundary problem for the heat equation arising from a problem in mathematical economics,” Industrial Management Review, vol. 6, pp. 32-39, 1965. |

[4] | P. van Moerbeke, “On optimal stopping and free boundary problems,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 101-148, 1976. · Zbl 0336.35047 |

[5] | R. Geske and H. Johnson, “The American put option valued analytically,” Journal of Finance, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1511-1524, 1984. |

[6] | L. W. MacMillan, “An analytical approximation for the American put prices,” Advances in Futures and Options Research, vol. 1, pp. 119-139, 1986. |

[7] | G. Barone-Adesi and R. Whaley, “Efficient analytic approximation of American option values,” Journal of Finance, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 301-320, 1987. |

[8] | N. Ju, “Pricing an American option by approximating its early exercise boundary as a multipiece exponential function,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 627-646, 1998. |

[9] | M. Brennan and E. Schwartz, “Finite difference methods and jump processes arising in the pricing of contingent claims: a synthesis,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 461-474, 1978. |

[10] | J. Hull and A. White, “Valuing derivative securities using the explicit finite difference method,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 87-100, 1990. |

[11] | F. A. Longstaff and E. S. Schwartz, “Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 113-147, 2001. · Zbl 1386.91144 |

[12] | S. P. Zhu, “An exact and explicit solution for the valuation of American put options,” Quantitative Finance, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 229-242, 2006. · Zbl 1136.91468 |

[13] | J. Zhao and H. Y. Wong, “A closed-form solution to American options under general diffusion processes,” Quantitative Finance, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 725-737, 2012. · Zbl 1278.91171 |

[14] | J. C. Cox, S. A. Ross, and M. Rubinstein, “Option pricing: a simplified approach,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 229-263, 1979. · Zbl 1131.91333 |

[15] | D. Grant, G. Vora, and D. E. Weeks, “Simulation and the early-exercise option problem,” Journal of Financial Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 211-227, 1996. |

[16] | D. \vSev\vcovi\vc, “An iterative algorithm for evaluating approximations to the optimal exercise boundary for a nonlinear Black-Scholes equation,” Canadian Applied Mathematics Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 77-97, 2007. · Zbl 1145.35321 |

[17] | S. P. Zhu, “A new analytical approximation formula for the optimal exercise boundary of American put options,” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1141-1177, 2006. · Zbl 1140.91415 |

[18] | L. X. Wu and Y. K. Kwok, “A front-fixing finite difference method for the valuation of American options,” Journal of Financial Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 83-97, 1997. |

[19] | B. F. Nielsen, O. Skavhaug, and A. Tveito, “Penalty and front-fixing methods for the numerical solution of American option problems,” Journal of Computational Finance, vol. 5, pp. 69-97, 2002. |

[20] | Y. l. Zhu, B. M. Chen, H. Ren, and H. Xu, “Application of the singularity-separating method to American exotic option pricing,” Advances in Computational Mathematics, vol. 19, no. 1-3, pp. 147-158, 2003. · Zbl 1042.91029 |

[21] | K. Muthuraman, “A moving boundary approach to American option pricing,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 3520-3537, 2008. · Zbl 1181.91300 |

[22] | S. P. Zhu and J. Zhang, “A new predictor-corrector scheme for valuing American puts,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 9, pp. 4439-4452, 2011. · Zbl 1237.91236 |

[23] | S. P. Zhu and W. T. Chen, “A predictor-corrector scheme based on the ADI method for pricing American puts with stochastic volatility,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1-26, 2011. · Zbl 1228.91077 |

[24] | B. J. Kim, C. Ahn, and H. J. Choe, “Direct computation for American put option and free boundary using finite difference method,” Japan Journal of Industiral and Applied Mathematics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 21-37, 2013. · Zbl 1258.91219 |

[25] | I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve, Methods of Mathematical Finance, vol. 39 of Applications of Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1998. · Zbl 0979.90127 |

[26] | A. Chockalingam and K. Muthuraman, “An approximate moving boundary method for American options,” Working Paper, The University of Texas at Austin, 2010. · Zbl 1203.91288 |

[27] | H. Pham, “Optimal stopping, free boundary, and American option in a jump-diffusion model,” Applied Mathematics and Optimization, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 145-164, 1997. · Zbl 0866.60038 |

[28] | I. J. Kim, “The analytic valuation of American options,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 547-572, 1990. |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.