##
**Optimal design of viscoelastic vibration absorbers for rotating systems.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1271.74147

Summary: All rotating systems are subjected to residual unbalance forces that are proportional to speed squared. Systems that operate close to the critical speed and have low damping can generate destructive vibrations. Dynamic vibration absorbers are simple devices attached to a mechanical structure (the primary system) to reduce vibrations and noise levels and are extensively used in non-rotating systems. This study addresses the design of viscoelastic vibration absorbers for rotating systems. The primary system is modeled using modal parameters obtained in the frequency domain of the state-space representation. Using a methodology that has a more general application, the compound system (the primary system and absorbers) is represented in a modal subspace of the primary system state space. In this modal subspace, the optimal design of the dynamic viscoelastic absorbers is performed using an optimization algorithm. The objective function to be minimized is defined as the Euclidean norm of the vector composed of the maximal absolute values of the principal coordinates. The absorbers are attached to a floating bearing located away from a nodal point. Numerical and experimental results are presented and discussed.

### MSC:

74H45 | Vibrations in dynamical problems in solid mechanics |

74P10 | Optimization of other properties in solid mechanics |

74D05 | Linear constitutive equations for materials with memory |

### Keywords:

dynamic absorbers; flexural vibration control; optimization; rotordynamics; viscoelastic material
PDFBibTeX
XMLCite

\textit{F. J. Doubrawa Filho} et al., J. Vib. Control 17, No. 5, 699--710 (2011; Zbl 1271.74147)

Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | Adams Jr ML, Rotating Machinery Vibration - from Analysis to Troubleshooting (2001) |

[2] | DOI: 10.1177/107754630100700207 · Zbl 1006.70512 |

[3] | Bavastri CA, Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control (MOVIC 98) |

[4] | DOI: 10.1590/S1678-58782008000100004 |

[5] | Den Hartog JP, Mechanical Vibrations (1985) |

[6] | Espíndola JJ, Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC’97/VIB-4120 |

[7] | DOI: 10.1177/1077546308087400 · Zbl 1229.74064 |

[8] | Espíndola JJ, Proceedings of 10th International Modal Analysis Conference |

[9] | Ewins DJ, Modal Testing: Theory, Practice and Application (2000) |

[10] | Frahm H., US Patent (989959) (1909) |

[11] | DOI: 10.1007/0-387-28687-X |

[12] | Hope RW, Proceedings of the ASME/IGTI Turbo Expo |

[13] | DOI: 10.1080/14786440308635889 |

[14] | Jones DIG, Viscoelastic Vibration Damping (2001) |

[15] | DOI: 10.1016/0022-460X(83)90357-7 · Zbl 0525.73101 |

[16] | Lakes RS, Viscoelastic Solids (1999) |

[17] | Lalanne M., Rotordynamics Prediction in Engineering (2001) |

[18] | DOI: 10.2514/8.11116 |

[19] | Nashif AD, Vibration Damping (1985) |

[20] | DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1996.0406 · Zbl 1235.34026 |

[21] | Prohl MA, Applied Mechanics 12 (3) pp 142– (1945) |

[22] | DOI: 10.1122/1.549710 · Zbl 0557.73038 |

[23] | DOI: 10.1016/S0094-114X(99)00078-6 |

[24] | DOI: 10.1121/1.1907832 |

[25] | Stodola A., Steam and Gas Turbines (1927) |

[26] | Zhou S., The Shock and Vibration Digest 33 (5) pp 360– (2001) |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.