zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Aspirations as reference points: an experimental investigation of risk behavior over time. (English) Zbl 1271.91038
Summary: This paper examines the importance of aspirations as reference points in a multi-period decision-making context. After stating their personal aspiration level, 172 individuals made six sequential decisions among risky prospects as part of a choice experiment. The results show that individuals make different risky choices in a multi-period compared to a single-period setting. In particular, individuals’ aspiration level is their main reference point during the early stages of decision making, while their starting status (wealth level at the start of the experiment) becomes the central reference point during the later stages of their multi-period decision making.

MSC:
91B06Decision theory
Software:
Z-Tree
WorldCat.org
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Ackert L. F., Charupat N., Church B. K., Deaves R. (2006) An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Experimental Economics 9(1): 5--16 · Zbl 1132.91452 · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-1467-1
[2] Arkes H. R., Hirshleifer D., Jiang D., Lim S. (2008) Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 105(1): 67--81 · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.005
[3] Benartzi S., Thaler R. (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(1): 73--92 · Zbl 0829.90040 · doi:10.2307/2118511
[4] Bleichrodt H. (2007) Reference-dependent utility with shifting reference points and incomplete preferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 51(4): 266--276 · Zbl 1132.91367 · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2007.04.003
[5] Cohen M., Etner J., Jeleva M. (2008) Dynamic decision making when risk perception depends on past experience. Theory and Decision 64(2--3): 173--192 · Zbl 1136.91366 · doi:10.1007/s11238-007-9061-3
[6] Dellavigna S., LiCalzi M. (2001) Learning to make risk neutral choices in a symmetric world. Mathematical Social Sciences 41(1): 19--37 · Zbl 1013.91064 · doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(00)00055-X
[7] Denrell, J. (2004). Risk taking and aspiration levels: Two alternative null-models. Academy of Management Proceedings, pp.J1--J6. · Zbl 1232.91382
[8] Diecidue E., Van De Ven J. (2008) Aspiration level, probability of success and failure, and expected utility. International Economic Review 49(2): 683--700 · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00494.x
[9] Endres M. L. (2006) The effectiveness of assigned goals in complex financial decision making and the importance of gender. Theory and Decision 61(2): 129--157 · Zbl 1184.91070 · doi:10.1007/s11238-006-0006-z
[10] Fischbacher U. (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10(2): 171--178 · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
[11] Gneezy U., Potters J. (1997) An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 631--645 · doi:10.1162/003355397555217
[12] Gooding R. Z., Goel S., Wiseman R. M. (1996) Fixed versus variable reference points in the risk-return relationship. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 29(2): 331--350 · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(95)00067-4
[13] Harrison D. A., McLaughlin M. E., Coalter T. M. (1996) Context, cognition and common method variance: Psychometric and verbal protocol evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 68(3): 246--261 · doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0103
[14] Heath C., Larrick R. P., Wu G. (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology 38(1): 79--109 · doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0708
[15] Heyman J. E., Mellers B., Tishcenko S., Schwartz A. (2005) Shifting reference points and fleeting pleasures. Advances in Consumer Research 32: 116--117
[16] Howard G. S. (1994) Why do people say nasty things about self-reports?. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15(5): 399--404 · doi:10.1002/job.4030150505
[17] Itami H. (1976) Analysis of implied risk-taking behavior under a goal-based incentive scheme. Management Science 23(2): 183--197 · Zbl 0365.90010 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.23.2.183
[18] Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263--292 · Zbl 0411.90012 · doi:10.2307/1914185
[19] Lanyon R. I., Goodstein L. D. (1997) Personality Assessment (3rd ed.). Wiley, New York
[20] Lim R. G. (1995) A range-frequency explanation of shifting reference points in risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63(1): 6--20 · doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1057
[21] Liu H.-H., Colman A. M. (2009) Ambiguity Aversion in the long run: Repeated decisions under risk and uncertainty. Journal of Economic Psychology 30(3): 277--284 · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.001
[22] Loewenstein G. (1987) Anticipation and valuation of delayed consumption. Economic Journal 97(387): 667--684 · doi:10.2307/2232929
[23] Loewenstein G. (1988) Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Science 34(2): 210--214 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.2.200
[24] Loewenstein G., Prelec D. (1991) Negative time preference. American Economic Review 81(2): 347--352 · Zbl 0736.90001
[25] Lopes L. L. (1987) hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 20: 255--295
[26] Munro A., Sugden R. (2003) On the theory of reference-dependent preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 50(4): 407--428 · doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00033-1
[27] Odean T., Strahilevitz M., Barber M. B. (2005) Once burned twice shy, this stock has been good to me so far, and it could have been worse: How naïve learning and counterfactuals influence the repurchase of stocks previously sold. Advances in Consumer Research 32: 204
[28] Page L., Garboua L. L., Montmarquette C. (2007) Aspiration levels and educational choices: An experimental study. Economics of Education Review 26(6): 748--758 · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.06.001
[29] Payne J., Laughhunn D., Crum R. (1980) Translation of Gambles and Aspiration Level Effects in Risky Choice Behavior. Management Science 26(10): 1039--1060 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.26.10.1039
[30] Porcelli A. J., Delgado M. R. (2009) Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychological Science 20(3): 278--283 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02288.x
[31] Rachlin H. (1990) Why do people gamble and keep gambling despite heavy losses?. Psychological Science 1(5): 294--297 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00220.x
[32] Samuelson W. P., Zeckhauser R. (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(1): 7--59 · doi:10.1007/BF00055564
[33] Schmidt U. (2003) Reference dependence in cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 47(2): 122--131 · Zbl 1040.91028 · doi:10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00015-9
[34] Shefrin H. (2002) Beyond greed and fear: Understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[35] Shefrin H., Statman M. (2000) Behavioral portfolio theory. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35(2): 127--151 · doi:10.2307/2676187
[36] Sugden R. (2003) Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory 11(2): 172--191 · Zbl 1043.91022 · doi:10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00082-6
[37] Sullivan K., Kida T. (1995) The effect of multiple reference points and prior gains and losses on managers’ risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 64(1): 76--83 · doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1091
[38] Thaler R. H., Johnson E. J. (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even. Management Science 36(6): 643--660 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643
[39] Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481): 453--458 · Zbl 1225.91017 · doi:10.1126/science.7455683
[40] Weber E. U., Milliman R. A. (1997) Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science 43(2): 123--144 · Zbl 0900.90314 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.2.123
[41] Weber M., Zuchel H. (2005) How do prior outcomes affect risk attitude? Comparing escalation of commitment and the house-money effect. Decision Analysis 2(1): 30--43 · doi:10.1287/deca.1050.0034
[42] Zeisberger S., Langer T., Weber M. (2012) Why does myopia decrease the willingness to invest? Is it myopic loss aversion or myopic loss probability aversion?. Theory and Decision 72(1): 35--50 · Zbl 1274.91153 · doi:10.1007/s11238-010-9236-1