×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Small area estimation by splitting the sampling weights. (English) Zbl 1293.62022
Summary: A new method is proposed for small area estimation. The principle is based upon the splitting of the sampling weights between the areas. A matrix of weights is defined. Each column of this matrix enables us to estimate the total of the variables of interest at the level of an area. This method automatically satisfies the coherence property between the local estimates and the overall estimate. Moreover, the local estimators are calibrated on auxiliary information available at the level of the small areas. This methodology also enables the use of composite estimators that are weighted means between a direct estimator and a synthetic estimator. Once the weights are computed, the estimates can be easily computed for any variable of interest. A set of simulations shows the interest of the proposed method.

MSC:
62D05 Sampling theory, sample surveys
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI Euclid
References:
[1] Antal, E. and Tillé, Y. (2011). A Direct Bootstrap Method for Complex Sampling Designs From a Finite Population. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106 534-543. · Zbl 1232.62030
[2] Arora, H. R. and Brackstone, G. J. (1977). An investigation of the properties of raking ratio estimator: I. With simple random sampling. Survey Methodology 3 62-83.
[3] Battese, G. E., Harter, R. M. and Fuller, W. A. (1988). An Error-Components Model for Prediction of County Crop Areas Using Survey and Satellite Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83 28-36.
[4] Deville, J.-C. and Särndal, C.-E. (1992). Calibration estimators in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87 376-282. · Zbl 0760.62010
[5] Fay, R. E. and Herriot, R. A. (1979). Estimates of Income for Small Places: An Application of James-Stein Procedures to Census Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 269-277.
[6] Fuller, W. A. and Battese, G. E. (1973). Transformation for estimation of linear models with nested error structure. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68 626-632. · Zbl 0271.62087
[7] Gonzalez, M. E. (1973). Use and Evaluation of Synthetic Estimates. In Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section 33-36. American Statistical Society.
[8] Henderson, C. R. (1975). Best Linear Unbiased Estimation and Prediction under a Selection Model. Biometrika 31 423-447. · Zbl 0335.62048
[9] Horvitz, D. G. and Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47 663-685. · Zbl 0047.38301
[10] Ireland, C. T. and Kullback, S. (1968). Contingency tables with given marginals. Biometrika 55 179-188. · Zbl 0155.26701
[11] Prasad, N. G. N. and Rao, J. N. K. (1990). The Estimation of the Mean Squared Error of Small Area Estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85 163-171. · Zbl 0719.62064
[12] Prasad, N. G. N. and Rao, J. N. K. (1999). On Robust Small Area Estimation Using a Simple Random Effects Model. Survey Methodology 25 67-72.
[13] Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications . John Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0256.62002
[14] Rao, J. N. K. (2003). Small Area Estimation . Wiley, New-York. · Zbl 1026.62003
[15] Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. H. (1992). Model Assisted Survey Sampling . Springer. · Zbl 0742.62008
[16] Ugarte, M., Militino, A. and Goicoa, T. (2009). Benchmarked estimates in small areas using linear mixed models with restrictions. Test 18 342-364. 10.1007/s11749-008-0094-x. · Zbl 1203.62021
[17] You, Y. and Rao, J. N. K. (2002). A pseudo-empirical best linear unbiased prediction approach to small area estimation using survey weights. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 30 431-439. · Zbl 1018.62008
[18] You, Y. and Rao, J. N. K. (2003). Pseudo hierarchical Bayes small area estimation combining unit level models and survey weights. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 111 197-208. · Zbl 1033.62029
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.