×

Fusion systems and localities. (English) Zbl 1295.20021

Fusion systems generalize fusion in a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup \(P\) of a group \(G\) given by conjugacy, i.e., inner automorphisms of \(G\). Most important are so-called saturated fusion systems. All those, which are constructed as above are saturated. On the other hand not all saturated fusions system are the fusion system of a properly chosen group. These usually are called exotic and many examples for odd \(p\) are known. Nevertheless for so-called constrained fusion systems there is a uniquely determined model.
In this paper now the author proves that there is also a uniquely determined model for arbitrary saturated fusion systems, which is called a linking system. This solves a long standing open question. Precisely: Let \(\mathcal F\) be a saturated fusion system on the finite \(p\)-group \(P\), \(p\) a prime. Then there exists a centric linking system \(\mathcal L\) such that \(\mathcal F\) is the fusion system generated by the conjugation maps in \(\mathcal L\) between subgroups of \(P\). Further \(\mathcal L\) is uniquely determined by \(\mathcal F\), up to isomorphisms which restrict to the identity on \(P\).
For the proof the author introduces partial groups and localities which might be of independent interest. A partial group basically is like a group in which multiplication is not always defined according to some rules. A partial group \(\mathcal M\) together with a set \(\Delta\) of subgroups which control multiplication is called an objective partial group. If our \(p\)-group \(P\) in question is the unique maximal element in \(\Delta\), then \((\mathcal M,\Delta,P)\) is called a locality. A locality is a \(\Delta\)-linking system if for all \(U\in\Delta\), \(C_{\mathcal L}(U)=Z(U)\). If \(\Delta\) is the set of all \(U\leq P\) such that \(C_P(Q)=Z(Q)\) for every \(\mathcal L\)-conjugate \(Q\) of \(U\), \(Q\leq P\), then \(\mathcal L\) is called a centric linking system. With any locality \(\mathcal L=(\mathcal M,\Delta,P)\) is associated a fusion system \(\mathcal F=\mathcal F_P(\mathcal L)\) on \(P\). The theorem basically says that all saturated fusion systems arise in this way.
The proof uses the Thompson-subgroup \(J(R)\) of subgroups \(R\) of \(P\) and so it uses failure of factorization and the classification of such modules. This is where the paper is dependent on the classification of the finite simple groups.
There is a different proof of the same theorem due to B. Oliver [in Acta Math. 211, No. 1, 141-175 (2013; Zbl 1292.55007)].

MSC:

20D30 Series and lattices of subgroups
20D20 Sylow subgroups, Sylow properties, \(\pi\)-groups, \(\pi\)-structure
55R35 Classifying spaces of groups and \(H\)-spaces in algebraic topology

Citations:

Zbl 1292.55007
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Aschbacher, M., Finite Group Theory. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 10. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1986. · Zbl 0583.20001
[2] Aschbacher M.: Normal subsystems of fusion systems. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 97, 239–271 (2008) · Zbl 1241.20026 · doi:10.1112/plms/pdm057
[3] Aschbacher, M., Kessar, R. & Oliver, B., Fusion Systems in Algebra and Topology. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 391. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011. · Zbl 1255.20001
[4] Aschbacher M., Seitz G. M.: Involutions in Chevalley groups over fields of even order. Nagoya Math. J., 63, 1–91 (1976) · Zbl 0359.20014
[5] Benson, D. J., Cohomology of sporadic groups, finite loop spaces, and the Dickson invariants, in Geometry and Cohomology in Group Theory (Durham, 1994), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 252, pp. 10–23. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998. · Zbl 0928.55017
[6] Broto C., Castellana N., Grodal J., Levi R., Oliver B.: Subgroup families controlling p-local finite groups. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 91, 325–354 (2005) · Zbl 1090.20026 · doi:10.1112/S0024611505015327
[7] Broto C., Levi R., Oliver B.: The homotopy theory of fusion systems. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 16, 779–856 (2003) · Zbl 1033.55010 · doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-03-00434-X
[8] Bundy D., Hebbinghaus N., Stellmacher B.: The local C(G, T) theorem. J. Algebra, 300, 741–789 (2006) · Zbl 1102.20020 · doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2005.08.040
[9] Chermak A.: Quadratic action and the $${\(\backslash\)mathcal{P}(G, V)}$$ P ( G , V ) -theorem in arbitrary characteristic. J. Group Theory, 2, 1–13 (1999) · Zbl 0940.20016 · doi:10.1515/jgth.1999.002
[10] Goldschmidt D.M.: A conjugation family for finite groups. J. Algebra, 16, 138–142 (1970) · Zbl 0198.04306 · doi:10.1016/0021-8693(70)90046-3
[11] Gorenstein, D., Finite Groups. Harper & Row, New York, 1968. · Zbl 0185.05701
[12] Gorenstein, D., Lyons, R. & Solomon, R., The Classification of the Finite Simple Groups. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 40. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994. · Zbl 0816.20016
[13] Kurzweil, H. & Stellmacher, B., The Theory of Finite Groups. Universitext. Springer, New York, 2004. · Zbl 1047.20011
[14] Meierfrankenfeld U., Stellmacher B.: The other $${\(\backslash\)mathcal{P}(G, V)}$$ P ( G , V ) -theorem. Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Padova, 115, 41–50 (2006)
[15] Meierfrankenfeld U., Stellmacher B.: The general FF-module theorem. J. Algebra, 351, 1–63 (2012) · Zbl 1262.20003 · doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2011.10.029
[16] Oliver B., Ventura J.: Extensions of linking systems with p-group kernel. Math. Ann., 338, 983–1043 (2007) · Zbl 1134.55011 · doi:10.1007/s00208-007-0104-4
[17] Puig L.: Frobenius categories. J. Algebra, 303, 309–357 (2006) · Zbl 1110.20011 · doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.01.023
[18] Puig L., Frobenius Categories versus Brauer Blocks. Progress in Mathematics, 274. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2009. · Zbl 1192.20008
[19] Stancu, R., Equivalent definitions of fusion systems. Preprint, 2004.
[20] Thompson J. G.: A replacement theorem for p-groups and a conjecture. J. Algebra, 13, 149–151 (1969) · Zbl 0194.03902 · doi:10.1016/0021-8693(69)90068-4
[21] Timmesfeld F.: A remark on Thompson’s replacement theorem and a consequence. Arch. Math. (Basel), 38, 491–495 (1982) · Zbl 0495.20003 · doi:10.1007/BF01304821
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.