Robert, Christian P.; Chopin, Nicolas; Rousseau, Judith Rejoinder: “Harold Jeffreys’s Theory of probability revisited”. (English) Zbl 1328.62013 Stat. Sci. 24, No. 2, 191-194 (2009). Summary: We are grateful to all discussants of our re-visitation for their strong support in our enterprise and for their overall agreement with our perspective. Further discussions with them and other leading statisticians showed that the legacy of Theory of probability [Oxford: Clarendon Press (1939; Zbl 0023.14501)] is alive and lasting.Rejoinder to the comments [Zbl 1328.62008; Zbl 1328.62009; Zbl 1328.62010; Zbl 1328.62011; Zbl 1328.62014; Zbl 1328.62015] to the authors’ paper [ibid. 24, No. 2, 141–172 (2009; Zbl 1328.62012)]. MSC: 62-03 History of statistics 62A01 Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics 62F15 Bayesian inference 01A60 History of mathematics in the 20th century Citations:Zbl 0023.14501; Zbl 1328.62008; Zbl 1328.62009; Zbl 1328.62010; Zbl 1328.62011; Zbl 1328.62014; Zbl 1328.62015; Zbl 1328.62012 Software:BayesDA × Cite Format Result Cite Review PDF Full Text: DOI arXiv Euclid References: [1] Bayarri, M. and Garcia-Donato, G. (2007). Extending conventional priors for testing general hypotheses in linear models. Biometrika 94 135-152. · Zbl 1142.62324 · doi:10.1093/biomet/asm014 [2] Berger, J. and Wolpert, R. (1988). The Likelihood Principle , 2nd ed. IMS, Hayward, CA. · Zbl 1060.62500 [3] Berger, J., Bernardo, J. and Sun, D. (2009). Natural induction: An objective Bayesian approach. RACSAM Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. 103 125-135. · Zbl 1177.62030 · doi:10.1007/BF03191839 [4] Bickel, P. and Ghosh, J. (1990). A decomposition for the likelihood ratio statistic and the Bartlett correction-a Bayesian argument. Ann. Statist. 18 1070-1090. · Zbl 0727.62035 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176347740 [5] Gelman, A., Carlin, J. Stern, H. and Rubin, D. (2001). Bayesian Data Analysis , 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, New York. · Zbl 1279.62004 [6] Robert, C. (1994). The Bayesian Choice . Springer, New York. [7] Templeton, A. (2008). Statistical hypothesis testing in intraspecific phylogeography: Nested clade phylogeographical analysis vs. approximate Bayesian computation. Molecular Ecology 18 319-331. This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.