×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Estimating the rational expectations model of speculative storage: a Monte Carlo comparison of three simulation estimators. (English) Zbl 1122.62386
Summary: The non-negativity constraint on inventories imposed on the rational expectations theory of speculative storage implies that the conditional mean and variance of commodity prices are non-linear in lagged prices and have a kink at a threshold point. In this paper, the structural parameters of this model are estimated using three simulation-based estimators. In a Monte Carlo experiment, the finite sample properties of the simulated methods of moments estimator of D. Duffie and K. J. Singleton [Econometrica 61, No. 4, 929–952 (1993; Zbl 0783.62099)] the indirect inference estimator of C. Gourieroux et al. [J. Appl. Econometrics 8, S85–S118 (1993)] and the efficient method of moments estimator of A. R. Gallant and G. Tauchen [Econometric Theory 12, 657–681 (1996)] are assessed. Exploiting the invariant distribution implied by the theory allows us to evaluate the error induced by simulations. Our results show that the estimators differ in their sensitivity to the sample size, the number of simulations, choice of auxiliary models, and computation demands. For some estimators, the test for overidentifying restrictions exhibit significant size distortions in small samples. Overall, while the simulation estimators have small bias, they are less efficient than pseudo-maximum likelihood (PMLE). Hence for the small sample sizes considered, the simulation estimators are still inferior to the PMLE estimates in a mean-squared sense.

MSC:
62P20 Applications of statistics to economics
65C05 Monte Carlo methods
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Altug, S.: Time to build and aggregate fluctuations: some new evidence. International economic review 30, 889-920 (1989) · Zbl 0694.62060
[2] Bansal, R.; Gallant, R.; Hussey, R.; Tauchen, G.: Non parametric estimation of structural models fir high frequency currency market data. Journal of econometrics 66, 251-287 (1995) · Zbl 0813.62095
[3] Berndt, E.; Hall, B.; Hall, R.; Hausman, J.: Estimation and inference in nonlinear structural models. Annals of economic and social measurement 3, 653-666 (1974)
[4] Carroll, C.: Buffer stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis. Quarterly journal of economics 112, No. 1, 1659-1686 (1997) · Zbl 0882.90023
[5] Carroll, C., Samwick, A., 1997. The nature of precautionary wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics 40(1).
[6] Carroll, C., Samwick, A., 1998. How important is precautionary saving? Review of Economics and Statistics 80 3 410–419.
[7] Deaton, A.: Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica 59, No. 5, 1221-1248 (1991)
[8] Deaton, A., Laroque, G., 1992. On the behavior of commodity prices. Review of Economic Studies 1–23. · Zbl 0729.91007
[9] Deaton, A., Laroque, G., 1995. Estimating a nonlinear rational expectations commodity price model with unobserved state variables. Journal of Applied Econometrics S3–S55.
[10] Deaton, A.; Laroque, G.: Competitive storage and commodity price dynamics. Journal of political economy 104, No. 5, 896-923 (1996)
[11] Dixit, A., Pindyck, R., 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
[12] Duffie, D.; Singleton, K.: Simulated moments estimation of Markov models of asset prices. Econometrica 61, No. 4, 929-952 (1993) · Zbl 0783.62099
[13] Gallant, R.; Tauchen, G.: Which moments to match. Econometric theory 12, 657-681 (1996)
[14] Gourieroux, C.; Monfort, A.; Renault, E.: Indirect inference. Journal of applied econometrics 8, S85-S118 (1993)
[15] Gourinchas, P., Parker, J., 1996. Consumption over the life cycle. MIT Mimeo. · Zbl 1137.91519
[16] Gross, D., 1994. The investment and financing decisions of liquidity constrained firms. MIT Mimeo.
[17] Gustafson, R., 1958. Carryover Levels for Grains. US Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin, 1178.
[18] Hotz, J.; Miller, R.: Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic programming models. Review of economic studies 60, 497-530 (1993) · Zbl 0788.90007
[19] Ludvigson, S., 1999. Consumption and credit: a model of time varying liquidity constraints. Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.
[20] Ludvigson, S., Michaelides, A., 1999. Can buffer stock saving explain the consumption excesses? Federal Reserve Bank of New York Working Paper.
[21] McGrattan, E., Rogerson, R., Wright, R., 1992. An equilibrium model of the business cycle with household production and fiscal policy. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Staff Report 191. · Zbl 0889.90034
[22] Ng, S.: Looking for evidence of speculative stockholding in commodity markets. Journal of economics dynamics and control 20, 123-143 (1996) · Zbl 0875.90054
[23] Ohanian, L., Violante, G., Krusell, P., Ríos-Rull, J., 1997. Simulation-based estimation of a nonlinear latent factor aggregate production. Mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. · Zbl 1184.62213
[24] Pakes, A., 1994. Dynamic structural models, problems and prospects: mixed continuous discrete controls and market interactions. In: Sims, C.A. (Ed.), Advances in Econometrics: Sixth World Congress, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[25] Rust, J.: Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: an empirical model of harold zurcher. Econometrica 55, 999-1057 (1987) · Zbl 0624.90034
[26] Rust, J., 1994. Estimation of dynamic structural models, problems and prospects: discrete decisions. In: Sims, C.A. (Ed.), Advances in Econometrics: Sixth World Congress, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[27] Samuelson, P.: Stochastic speculative price. Proceedings of the national Academy of science 68, 335-337 (1971) · Zbl 0217.57102
[28] Tauchen, G.: Finite state Markov chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions. Economics letters 20, 177-181 (1986)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.