Effects of distance and shape on the estimation of the piecewise growth mixture model. (English) Zbl 1436.62274

J. Classif. 36, No. 3, 659-677 (2019); erratum ibid. 36, No. 3, 678 (2019).
Summary: The piecewise growth mixture model is used in longitudinal studies to tackle non-continuous trajectories and unobserved heterogeneity in a compound way. This study investigated how factors such as latent distance and shape influence the model. Two simulation studies were used exploring the 2- and 3-class situation with sample size, latent distance (Mahalanobis distance), and shape being considered as the influencing factor. The results of two simulations showed that a non-parallel shape led to a slightly better overall model fit. Parameter estimation is affected by the shape, mainly through the parameter differences between latent classes.


62H30 Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects)
62H11 Directional data; spatial statistics
Full Text: DOI


[1] Bauer, Dj; Curran, Pj, Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes, Psychological Methods, 8, 3, 338-363 (2003)
[2] Bauer, Dj; Curran, Pj, Overextraction of latent trajectory classes: much ado about nothing? Reply to Rindskopf (2003), Muthén (2003), and Cudeck and Henly (2003), Psychological Methods, 8, 3, 384-393 (2003)
[3] Depaoli, S., Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: frequentist versus Bayesian estimation, Psychological Methods, 18, 2, 186-219 (2013)
[4] Duncan, Sc; Duncan, Te, Modeling incomplete longitudinal substance use data using latent variable growth curve methodology, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 4, 313-338 (1994)
[5] Duncan, Te; Duncan, Sc, Modeling the processes of development via latent variable growth curve methodology, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2, 3, 187-213 (1995)
[6] Duncan, Te; Duncan, Sc; Alpert, A.; Hops, H.; Stoolmiller, M.; Muthen, B., Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel substance use data, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 3, 275-318 (1997)
[7] Dziak, Jj; Lanza, St; Tan, X., Effect size, statistical power and sample size requirements for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test in latent class analysis, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 4, 534-552 (2014)
[8] Gudicha, Dw; Schmittmann, Vd; Tekle, Fb; Vermunt, Jk, Power analysis for the likelihood-ratio test in latent Markov models: shortcutting the bootstrap p-value-based method, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 5, 649-660 (2016)
[9] Guerra-Peña, K.; Steinley, D., Extracting spurious latent classes in growth mixture modeling with nonnormal errors, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 6, 933-953 (2016)
[10] Henson, Jm; Reise, Sp; Kim, Kh, Detecting mixtures from structural model differences using latent variable mixture modeling: a comparison of relative model fit statistics, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 2, 202-226 (2007)
[11] Jung, T.; Wickrama, Kas, An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1, 302-317 (2008)
[12] Kainz, K.; Vernon-Feagans, L., The ecology of early reading development for children in poverty, Elementary School Journal, 107, 5, 407-427 (2007)
[13] Kamata, A.; Nese, Jf; Patarapichayatham, C.; Lai, C-F, Modeling nonlinear growth with three data points: illustration with benchmarking data, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 1534508412457872, 105-116 (2012)
[14] Kim, Sy, Determining the number of latent classes in single- and multi-phase growth mixture models, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 2, 263-279 (2014)
[15] Kohli, N.; Harring, Jr, Modeling growth in latent variables using a piecewise function, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 3, 370-397 (2013)
[16] Kohli, N.; Hughes, Jr; Wang, C.; Zopluoglu, C.; Davison, Ml, Fitting a linear-linear piecewise growth mixture model with unknown knots: a comparison of two common approaches to inference, Psychological Methods, 20, 2, 259-275 (2015)
[17] Kohli, N.; Hughes, Jr; Zopluoglu, C., A finite mixture of nonlinear random coefficient models for continuous repeated measures data, Psychometrika, 81, 3, 851-880 (2016) · Zbl 1345.62153
[18] Li, F.; Duncan, Te; Duncan, Sc; Hops, H., Piecewise growth mixture modeling of adolescent alcohol use data, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 2, 175-204 (2001)
[19] Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Li, H.; Zhao, Q., The effects of individually varying times of observations on growth parameter estimations in piecewise growth model, Journal of Applied Statistics, 42, 9, 1843-1860 (2015)
[20] Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Hau, K-T, Reading ability development from kindergarten to junior secondary: latent transition analyses with growth mixture modeling, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1659 (2016)
[21] Liu, Y., Zhao, Q., & Liu, H. (2013). Methods comparison of piecewise growth modeling. Psychological Exploration, 33(5), 415-422. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2013.05.006.
[22] Lo, Y.; Mendell, Nr; Rubin, Db, Testing the number of components in a normal mixture, Biometrika, 88, 3, 767-778 (2001) · Zbl 0985.62019
[23] Lubke, G.; Muthén, Bo, Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 1, 26-47 (2007)
[24] Lubke, G.; Neale, Mc, Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: resolution by maximum likelihood?, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 4, 499-532 (2006)
[25] Lubke, G.; Neale, Mc, Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors with categorical outcomes: class invariance of parameters of factor mixture models, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 4, 592-620 (2008)
[26] Lubke, G.; Tueller, S., Latent class detection and class assignment: a comparison of the MAXEIG taxometric procedure and factor mixture modeling approaches, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 4, 605-628 (2010)
[27] Mcardle, Jj; Epstein, D., Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models, Child Development, 58, 110-133 (1987)
[28] Mcauley, E.; Mailey, El; Mullen, Sp; Szabo, An; Wójcicki, Tr; White, Sm, Growth trajectories of exercise self-efficacy in older adults: Influence of measures and initial status, Health Psychology, 30, 1, 75-83 (2011)
[29] Mclachlan, Gj, On bootstrapping the likelihood ratio test statistic for the number of components in a normal mixture, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36, 3, 318-324 (1987)
[30] Muthén, Bo, Beyond SEM: general latent variable modeling, Behaviormetrika, 29, 1, 81-117 (2002) · Zbl 1017.62125
[31] Muthén, Bo; Kaplan, D., Latent variable analysis: growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data, The SAGE handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences, 346-370 (2004), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
[32] Muthén, Bo; Brown, Hc, Estimating drug effects in the presence of placebo response: causal inference using growth mixture modeling, Statistics in Medicine, 28, 27, 3363-3385 (2009)
[33] Muthén, Bo; Shedden, K., Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm, Biometrics, 55, 2, 463-469 (1999) · Zbl 1059.62599
[34] Nylund, Kl; Asparouhov, T.; Muthén, Bo, Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 4, 535-569 (2007)
[35] Peugh, J.; Fan, X., How well does growth mixture modeling identify heterogeneous growth trajectories? A simulation study examining GMM’s performance characteristics, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19, 2, 204-226 (2012)
[36] Preacher, Kj; Merkle, Ec, The problem of model selection uncertainty in structural equation modeling, Psychological Methods, 17, 1, 1-14 (2012)
[37] Raudenbush, Sw; Bryk, As, Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2002), Thousand Oaks: Sage, Thousand Oaks
[38] Snijders, T.; Bosker, R., Multilevel modeling: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (1999), Newbury Park: Sage, Newbury Park · Zbl 0953.62127
[39] Tekle, Fb; Gudicha, Dw; Vermunt, Jk, Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models, Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 10, 2, 209-224 (2016) · Zbl 1414.62061
[40] Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2008). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317-341). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
[41] Tolvanen, A. (2007). Latent growth mixture modeling: a simulation study. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Jyväskylä, Finland. · Zbl 1153.65012
[42] Tourangeau, K.; Nord, C.; Lê, T.; Sorongon, A.; Najarian, M.; Hausken, E., Early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K), combined user’s manual for the ECLS-K eighth-grade and K-8 full sample data files and electronic codebooks (NCES 2009-004) (2009), Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC
[43] Tueller, S.; Lubke, G., Evaluation of structural equation mixture models: parameter estimates and correct class assignment, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 2, 165-192 (2010)
[44] Wang, L.; Mcardle, Jj, A simulation study comparison of Bayesian estimation with conventional methods for estimating unknown change points, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 1, 52-74 (2008)
[45] Yang, C-C, Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50, 4, 1090-1104 (2006) · Zbl 1431.62516
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.