×

Would you prefer your retirement income to depend on your life expectancy? (English) Zbl 1466.91251

A pension scheme is constructed where the consumption (pension) depends on additional information on the survival probability. There are two periods. The agent learns about her state at the beginning of period one. For each of the states there is a survival probability \(\pi_i\). At the end of period one, the agent learns whether she survives or not. Depending on the state, there is a (maximal) consumption rate \(y_1^i\). In period two, the maximal consumption rate is \(y_2^{i j}\) with \(y_2^{i 0} = 0\) (the agent is dead) and \(y_2^{i 1} > 0\). There is a budget constraint that limits the expected outgo for pensions. The value of the chosen consumption is measured by a utility function \(U(\{(c_1^i,c_2^{i j})\})\). It is assumed that there are \(N\) states \(i \in \{1,2,\ldots, N\}\) chosen at the beginning of period one with equal probabilities. The problem becomes \[ \max_{(y_1^i, y_2^i)} \max_{(c_1^i,c_2^{i j})} U\left(\left\{(c_1^i,c_2^{i j})\right\}_{i ,j} \right)\;, \] subject to \[ c_1^i \le y_1^i\;,\qquad c_2^{i1} \le y_2^i + (1+r)(y_1^i - c_1^i)\; \]
\[ \frac1N \sum_{i=1}^N \Bigl(y_1^i + \frac{\pi_i y_2^{i 1}}{1+r}\Bigr) \le B\;. \] The function \(U\) should be increasing in each of the variables. Under the natural assumptions on \(U\), one gets \(c_1^i = y_1^i\), such that the optimisation problem becomes \[ \max_{(c_1^i,c_2^i)} U\left(\left\{(c_1^i,c_2^i)\right\}_{i ,j} \right)\;, \] subject to \[ \frac1N \sum_{i=1}^N \Bigl(c_1^i + \frac{\pi_i c_2^{i 1}}{1+r}\Bigr) = B\;. \] Note that it is possible that the agent may prefer death after period one to a low consumption \(c_1^{i 1}\).
The preferences are now defined as \(V_2^i = u_2\) (in the final period) and \(V_1 = u_1 + \beta \mathcal{I}(\{V_2^i\})\) in the first period. The certainty equivalent \(\mathcal{I}\) is assumed to be continuous, increasing, symmetric, translation equivalent and super-modular. \(\beta\) is a time preference parameter and \(u_k\) are utility functions. Examples for the function \(\mathcal{I}\) are \(\mathcal{I}(\{V_2^i\}) = N^{-1} \sum V_2^i\) or \(\mathcal{I}(\{V_2^i\}) = -k^{-1} \ln (N^{-1} \sum e^{-k V_2^i})\) for some \(k \ne 0\). Some basic properties are proved and an explicit example is discussed.

MSC:

91G05 Actuarial mathematics
91B16 Utility theory
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Ai, Hengjie; Bansal, Ravi, Risk preferences and the macroeconomic announcement premium, Econometrica, 86, 4, 1383-1430 (2018) · Zbl 1396.91500
[2] Aldy, Joseph E.; Kip Viscusi, W., Age differences in the value of statistical life: revealed preference evidence, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 1, 2, 241-260 (2007) · Zbl 1188.91104
[3] Andersen, Steffen; Harrison, Glenn W.; Lau, Morten I.; Rutström, E. Elisabet, Multiattribute utility theory, intertemporal utility and correlation aversion, Int. Econ. Rev., 59, 2, 537-555 (2018) · Zbl 1416.91112
[4] Arnold, Barry C., Majorization and the Lorenz Order: A Brief Introduction (1987), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin · Zbl 0649.62041
[5] Arnold, Barry C.; Marshall, Albert W.; Olkin, Ingram, Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications (2011), Springer Science+Business Media · Zbl 1219.26003
[6] Becker, Gary S.; Philipson, Tomas J.; Soares, Rodrigo R., The quantity and quality of life and the evolution of world inequality, Am. Econ. Rev., 95, 1, 277-291 (2005)
[7] Bommier, Antoine, Uncertain lifetime and intertemporal choice: risk aversion as a rationale for time discounting, Int. Econ. Rev., 47, 4, 1223-1246 (2006)
[8] Bommier, Antoine, Life-cycle preferences revisited, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 11, 6, 1290-1319 (2013)
[9] Bommier, Antoine; Le Grand, François, Too risk averse to purchase insurance? A theoretical glance at the annuity puzzle, J. Risk Uncertain., 48, 2, 135-166 (2014)
[10] Bommier, Antoine; Schernberg, Hélène, The Optimal Allocation of Longevity Risk with Perfect Insurance Markets (2018), ETH: ETH Zurich, Working Paper
[11] Bommier, Antoine, Asen Kochov, and François Le Grand. On monotone recursive preferences, Econometrica, 85, 5, 1433-1466 (2017) · Zbl 1420.91048
[12] Cameron, Trudy A., Euthanizing the value of a statistical life, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 4, 2, 161-178 (2010)
[13] Cook, Philip J.; Graham, Daniel A., The demand for insurance and protection: the case of irreplaceable commodities, Q. J. Econ., 91, 1, 143-156 (1977)
[14] Cristina De Nardi, Maria, Wealth inequality and intergenerational links, Rev. Econ. Stud., 71, 3, 743-768 (2004) · Zbl 1103.91382
[15] De Nardi, Mariacristina; French, Eric; Jones, John B., Why do the elderly save? The role of medical expenses, J. Polit. Econ., 118, 1, 39-75 (2010)
[16] De Nardi, Mariacristina; French, Eric; Jones, John Bailey, Medicaid insurance in old age, Am. Econ. Rev., 106, 11, 3480-3520 (2016)
[17] Delprat, Gaetan; Leroux, Marie-Louise; Michaud, Pierre-Carl, Evidence on individual preferences for longevity risk, J. Pension Econ. Finance, 15, 2, 160-179 (2016)
[18] Denuit, Michel; Haberman, Steven; Renshaw, Arthur, Longevity-indexed life annuities, N. Am. Actuar. J., 15, 1, 97-111 (2011) · Zbl 1213.91088
[19] Drèze, Jacques H.; Rustichini, Aldo, State-dependent utility and decision theory, (Handbook of Utility Theory: Volume 2: Extensions (2004), Springer Science+Business Media: Springer Science+Business Media New York), 7-62, Chapter 16
[20] Epstein, Larry G.; Zin, Stanley E., Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: a theoretical framework, Econometrica, 57, 4, 937-969 (1989) · Zbl 0683.90012
[21] Epstein, Larry G.; Zin, Stanley E., ‘First-order’ risk aversion and the equity premium puzzle, J. Monet. Econ., 26, 3, 387-407 (1990)
[22] Fleurbaey, Marc, Assessing risky social situations, J. Polit. Econ., 118, 4, 649-680 (2010)
[23] Gilboa, Itzhak; Schmeidler, David, Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, J. Math. Econ., 18, 2, 141-153 (1989) · Zbl 0675.90012
[24] Hall, Robert E.; Jones, Charles, The value of life and the rise in health spending, Q. J. Econ., 122, 1, 39-72 (2007)
[25] Hammond, Peter J., Ex-ante and ex-post welfare optimality under uncertainty, Economica, 48, 191, 235-250 (1981)
[26] Hammond, Peter J., Ex-post optimality as a dynamically consistent objective for collective choice under uncertainty, (Pattanaik, Prasanta K.; Salles, Maurice, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 145 (1983), Elsevier), 175-205, Chapter 10 · Zbl 0541.90004
[27] Hansen, Lars Peter; Sargent, Thomas J., Discounted linear exponential quadratic Gaussian control, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 4, 5, 968-971 (1995) · Zbl 0825.93969
[28] Havránek, Tomáš, Measuring intertemporal substitution: the importance of method choices and selective reporting, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 13, 6, 1180-1204 (2015)
[29] Kihlstrom, Richard E.; Mirman, Leonard J., Risk aversion with many commodities, J. Econ. Theory, 8, 361-388 (1974)
[30] Kreps, David M.; Porteus, Evan L., Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory, Econometrica, 46, 1, 185-200 (1978) · Zbl 0382.90006
[31] Lockwood, Lee M., Bequest motives and the annuity puzzle, Rev. Econ. Dyn., 15, 2, 226-243 (2012)
[32] Lockwood, Lee M., Incidental bequests: bequest motives and the choice to self-insure late-life risks, Am. Econ. Rev., 108, 9, 2513-2550 (2018)
[33] Marinacci, Massimo; Montrucchio, Luigi, On concavity and supermodularity, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 344, 2, 642-654 (2008) · Zbl 1148.46005
[34] Milevsky, Moshe A.; Salisbury, Thomas S., Optimal retirement income tontines, Insur. Math. Econ., 64, 91-105 (2015) · Zbl 1348.91176
[35] Moreau, Jean-Jacques, Semi-continuité du sous-gradient d’une fonctionnelle, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 260, 1067-1070 (1965) · Zbl 0136.12102
[36] Quiggin, John; Chambers, Robert G., Supermodularity and risk aversion, Math. Soc. Sci., 52, 1, 1-14 (2006) · Zbl 1141.91546
[37] Quiggin, John; Chambers, Robert G., Supermodularity and the comparative statics of risk, Theory Decis., 62, 2, 97-117 (2007) · Zbl 1137.91501
[38] Richter, Andreas; Weber, Frederik, Mortality-indexed annuities: managing longevity risk via product design, N. Am. Actuar. J., 15, 2, 212-236 (2011)
[39] Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell, Second-order convex analysis, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal., 1, 1-16 (1999) · Zbl 0960.49017
[40] Yaari, Menahem E., Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer, Rev. Econ. Stud., 32, 2, 137-150 (1965)
[41] Yaari, Menahem E., The dual theory of choice under risk, Econometrica, 55, 1, 95-115 (1987) · Zbl 0616.90005
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.