Physico-mathematics and the search for causes in Descartes’ optics – 1619–1637. (English) Zbl 1274.01031

Schuster, John A.

Synthese 185, No. 3, 467-499 (2012).

Summary: One of the chief concerns of the young Descartes was with what he, and others, termed “physico-mathematics”. This signalled a questioning of the Scholastic Aristotelian view of the mixed mathematical sciences as subordinate to natural philosophy, non explanatory, and merely instrumental. Somehow, the mixed mathematical disciplines were now to become intimately related to natural philosophical issues of matter and cause. That is, they were to become more ‘physicalised’, more closely intertwined with natural philosophising, regardless of which species of natural philosophy one advocated. A curious, short-lived yet portentous epistemological conceit lay at the core of Descartes’ physico-mathematics – the belief that solid geometrical results in the mixed mathematical sciences literally offered windows into the realm of natural philosophical causation – that in such cases one could literally “see the causes”. Optics took pride of place within Descartes’ physico-mathematics project, because he believed it offered unique possibilities for the successful vision of causes. This paper traces Descartes’ early physico-mathematical program in optics, its origins, pitfalls and its successes, which were crucial in providing Descartes resources for his later work in systematic natural philosophy. It explores how Descartes exploited his discovery of the law of refraction of light – an achievement well within the bounds of traditional mixed mathematical optics – in order to derive – in the manner of physico-mathematics – causal knowledge about light, and indeed insight about the principles of a “dynamics” that would provide the laws of corpuscular motion and tendency to motion in his natural philosophical system.

MSC:

01A45	History of mathematics in the 17th century
78-03	History of optics and electromagnetic theory

Keywords:

Isaac Beeckman; Descartes’ optics; Descartes’ dynamics; Descartes’ dioptrique; hydrostatics; law of refraction of light; mixed mathematics; physico-mathematics

References:

[1]	Adam, C., & Tannery, P. (Eds.). (1974–1986). Oeuvres de Descartes, (2nd ed. 11 Vols.). Paris: Vrin.
[2]	Beeckman, I. (1939–1953). In C. de Waard (Ed.), Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634 (4 Vols.). The Hague: Nijhoff.
[3]	Bennet J. (1998) Practical geometry and operative knowledge. Configurations 6(2): 195–222
[4]	Bossha, J. (1908). Annexe note. Archives Neerlandaises des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, ser 2 t. 13, xii–xiv.
[5]	Buchdahl G. (1972) Methodological aspects of Kepler’s theory of refraction. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 3: 265–298
[6]	de Waard C. (1935–1936) Le manuscrit perdu de Snellius sur la refraction. Janus 39(40): 51–73
[7]	Dear P. (1995) Discipline and experience: The mathematical way in the scientific revolution. Chicago University Press, Chicago · Zbl 0997.01519
[8]	Gabbey A. (1980) Force and inertia in the seventeenth century: Descartes and Newton. In: Gaukroger S. (eds) Descartes: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Harvester, Sussex, pp 230–320 · Zbl 0448.01005
[9]	Gaukroger S. (1995) Descartes: An intellectual biography. Oxford University Press, Oxford
[10]	Gaukroger S., Schuster J. A. (2002) The hydrostatic paradox and the origins of Cartesian dynamics. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 33: 535–572
[11]	Henry, C., & Tannery, P. (Eds.). (1891–1912). Oeuvres de Fermat. t. II. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
[12]	Kepler, J. (1938). In M. Caspar (Ed.), Gesammelte Werke. Munich. · JFM 64.0013.02
[13]	Knudsen O., Pedersen K. M. (1968) The link between ”determination” and conservation of motion in Descartes’ dynamics. Centaurus 13: 183–186 · Zbl 0194.00203
[14]	Korteweg D.-J. (1896) Descartes et les manuscrits de Snellius d’après quelques documents nouveau. Révue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4: 489–501 · JFM 27.0009.07
[15]	Kramer P. (1882) Descartes und das Brechungsgesetz des Lichtes. Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematischer (Natur) Wissenschaften 4: 235–278 · JFM 14.0026.02
[16]	Lohne J. (1959) Thomas Harriot (1560–1621). The Tycho Brahe of optics. Centaurus 6: 113–121 · Zbl 0192.32101
[17]	Lohne J. (1963) Zur Geschichte des Brechungsgesetzes. Sudhoffs Archiv 47: 152–172
[18]	Mahoney M. (1973) The mathematical career of Pierre de Fermat 1601–1665. Princeton University Press, Princeton · Zbl 0264.01007
[19]	McLaughlin P. (2000) Force determination and impact. In: Gaukroger S., Schuster J. A., Sutton J. (eds) Descartes’ natural philosophy. Routledge, London, pp 81–112
[20]	Mersenne, M. (1932–1988). In C. de Waard, R. Pintard, B. Rochot, & A. Baelieu (Eds.), Correspondence du P. Marin Mersenne (17 Vols.). Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. · JFM 58.0034.03
[21]	Milhaud, G. (1921). Descartes savant. Paris: Felix Alcan.
[22]	Mouy, P. (1934). Le développement de la physique Cartésienne. Paris: Vrin.
[23]	Prendergast T. L. (1975) Motion, action and tendency in Descartes’ physics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 13: 453–462
[24]	Sabra A. I. (1967) Theories of light from Descartes to Newton. Oldbourne, London
[25]	Schuster J. A. (1980) Descartes’ mathesis universalis: 1618–1628. In: Gaukroger S. W. (eds) Descartes: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Harvester, Brighton, pp 41–96 · Zbl 0446.01007
[26]	Schuster J. A. (1986) Cartesian method as mythic speech: A diachronic and structural analysis. In: Schuster J. A., Yeo R. (eds) The politics and rhetoric of scientific method: Historical studies. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 33–95
[27]	Schuster J. A. (1993) Whatever should we do with Cartesian method: Reclaiming Descartes for the history of science. In: Voss S. (eds) Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 195–223
[28]	Schuster J. A. (2000) Descartes’ Opticien: The construction of the law of refraction and the manufacture of its physical rationales, 1618–29. In: Gaukroger S., Schuster J. A., Sutton J. (eds) Descartes’ natural philosophy. Routledge, London, pp 258–312
[29]	Schuster J. A. (2002) L’Aristotelismo e le sue Alternative. In: Garber D. (eds) La Rivoluzione Scientifica. Instituto della Enciclopedia Italiana (in Italian), Rome, pp 337–357
[30]	Schuster J. A. (2005) Descartes’ vortical celestial mechanics: A gambit in the natural philosophical contest of the early seventeenth century. In: Anstey P., Schuster J. (eds) The science of nature in the seventeenth century: Changing patterns of early modern natural philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–79
[31]	Shea W. (1991) The magic of motion and numbers: The scientific career of René Descartes. Science History Publications, Canton MA
[32]	Stevin, S. (1586). De Beghinselen des Waterwichts. In The principal works of Simon Stevin (Vol. 1, pp. 415–417). Leiden.
[33]	Vollgraff J. A. (1913) Pierre de la Ramée (1515–1572) et Willebrord Snel van Royen (1580–1626). Janus 18: 595–625
[34]	Vollgraff J. A. (1936) Snellius notes on the reflection and refraction of rays. Osiris 1: 718–725