## A criterion for existence of a positive solution of a nonlinear elliptic system.(English)Zbl 1161.35012

The author treats an elliptic system with gradient structure, governed by the pair $$(p,q)$$-Laplacian, posed on a smoothly bounded domain $$\Omega$$ in $$\mathbb{R}^N$$: $\begin{cases} -\Delta_{p_1}u=\frac{\partial H}{\partial u}(x;u,v), &x\in\Omega,\\ -\Delta_{p_2}v=\frac{\partial H}{\partial v}(x;u,v), &x\in\Omega,\\ u(x)=v(x)=0, &x\in\partial\Omega. \end{cases}\tag{1}$ Here $$1<p_i<N$$ and $$\Delta_p := \text{div} (| \nabla| ^{p-2}\nabla)$$ denotes the $$p$$-Laplacian, as usual. The potential function $$H$$ is given by $H(x;s,t):=\int_0^sh_1(x;r)\,dr+\int_0^th_2(x;r)\,dr +\left(\int_0^sg_1(x;r)\,dr\right) \left(\int_0^tg_2(x;r)\,dr\right),$ where $$h_i$$ and $$g_i$$ are positive Caratheodory functions, $$i=1,2$$. It is assumed that the functions $$h_i$$ are asymptotically homogeneous of orders $$p_i-1$$ in the second argument $$r$$, for $$r$$ near 0 and $$\infty$$, and that the functions $$g_i$$ are asymptotically homogeneous near $$r=0$$, of orders less than $$p_i-1$$. Some monotonicity conditions are imposed on $$h_i$$ and $$g_i$$, and concavity conditions on $$g_i$$.
The result states a sharp criterion for the existence of a unique positive solution to (1). It is formulated as a sign condition on the lowest eigenvalues of three related nonlinear eigenvalue problems. The proof is variational and employs the gradient structure of the problem.

### MSC:

 35J55 Systems of elliptic equations, boundary value problems (MSC2000) 35J50 Variational methods for elliptic systems
Full Text:

### References:

 [1] Bechah A., Electron. J. Differential Equations 2001 pp 1– [2] Berger M., Lectures on Nonlinear Problems in Mathematical Analysis, in: Nonlinearity and Functional Analysis (1975) [3] DOI: 10.1016/0362-546X(86)90011-8 · Zbl 0593.35045 · doi:10.1016/0362-546X(86)90011-8 [4] DOI: 10.1007/s00030-002-8130-0 · Zbl 1011.35050 · doi:10.1007/s00030-002-8130-0 [5] DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00112-2 · Zbl 1021.35034 · doi:10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00112-2 [6] Chabrowski J., Rev. Math. Univ. Complut. Madrid 9 pp 207– [7] DOI: 10.1155/S1085337502000829 · Zbl 1005.35036 · doi:10.1155/S1085337502000829 [8] de Thélin F., C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I 321 pp 589– [9] de Thélin F., Rev. Mat. Apl. 13 pp 1– [10] de Thélin F., Rev. Math. Univ. Complut. Madrid 6 pp 153– [11] Diaz J. I., C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 305 pp 521– [12] Kandilakis D. A., Electron. J. Differential Equations 2005 pp 1– [13] Drabek P., Differential Integral Equations 16 pp 1519– · Zbl 0425.34042 [14] El-Zahrani E. A., Electron. J. Differential Equations 2006 pp 1– [15] Felmer P., Comm. Partial Differential Equations 17 pp 2013– [16] DOI: 10.1155/S1085337504403078 · Zbl 1129.35372 · doi:10.1155/S1085337504403078 [17] Fernandez-Bonder J., J. Differential Equations 245 pp 845– [18] Zhang G., Electron. J. Differential Equations 2005 pp 1– [19] DOI: 10.1007/BF01449041 · Zbl 0561.35003 · doi:10.1007/BF01449041 [20] DOI: 10.1016/S0362-546X(02)00151-7 · Zbl 1087.35043 · doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(02)00151-7
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.