×

Evolutionism as a modern form of mechanicism. (English) Zbl 1181.00028

The idea of evolution doubtlessly marks a revolution in our way of thinking. It is the most recent achievement of philosophy and forms the basis of the modern world picture. Current discussions concerning the status of science now convey the impression that any scientific discipline that wants to satisfy modern requirements must also become a theory of evolution. These discussions ignore the reasons which once induced Kant to desist from reformulating classical mechanics as a theory of evolution and instead to found his critical philosophy, according to which the epistemological starting points of natural science and philosophy are different in principle. In other words, there is no examination of whether the reasons given by Kant are of a principle nature so that they are still valid today, but rather, ignoring Kant’s arguments, it is taken for granted that a different physical theory than classical mechanics could achieve this.
Because nonlinear thermodynamics in particular is often presented as a candidate that justifies hopes of an evolutionary physics, the position of this branch within the structure of physics will be investigated here. It will be seen that a historical component is introduced into physics via initial, boundary, and other supplementary conditions, but that this does not mean that historicity has been grasped in laws, which is of course the point of a scientific theory of development.
It is demonstrated that the conclusion drawn for physics by some authors from nonlinear thermodynamics, according to which physics today becomes an evolutionary physics incorporating the cognitive subject, is wrong. The progress made by modern thermodynamics is, without doubt, significant. The widespread philosophical interpretation of thermodynamics rests, however, on an antiquated ontologization of physical concepts and thus on the usual procedure of mechanicism.
If one tries to introduce the conception of evolution into natural science by leveling the difference between philosophy and natural science in a mechanistic manner, then the dialectical evolutionary conception which represents a new epoch of human thinking degenerates to an evolutionism, where lawfulness is replaced by accidentalness.

MSC:

00A79 Physics
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] von Borzeszkowski, Physikalischer Dualismus und dialektischer Widerspruch. Studien zum physikalischen Bewegungsbegriff (1988)
[2] Glansdorff, Dialektik 5. Darwin und die Evolutionstheorie pp 58– (1982)
[3] von Borzeszkowski, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 34 pp 1098– (1986)
[4] DOI: 10.1007/BF00738746 · doi:10.1007/BF00738746
[5] Engels, Dialektik der Natur 20 (1962)
[6] Engels, Herrn Eugen Duhrings Umwälzung der Wissenschaft 20 (1962)
[7] von Borzeszkowski, Dialektik 5. Darwin und die Evolutionsiheorie pp 170– (1982)
[8] Einstein, Physikalische Zeitschrift 10 pp 817– (1909)
[9] von Borzeszkowski, Dialektik 1. Orientierungen der Philosophie pp 56– (1980)
[10] Damerow, Rechenstein, Experiment, Sprache. Historische Fallstudien zur Entstehung der exakten Wissenschaften (1981)
[11] von Borzeszkowski, Newton und Voltaire. ZurBegrundung und Interpretation derklassischen Mechanik (1980)
[12] Boltzmann, Ein Wort der Mathematik an die Energetik (1905)
[13] von Borzeszkowski, Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie 28 pp 685– (1980)
[14] DOI: 10.1002/andp.18972960216 · doi:10.1002/andp.18972960216
[15] DOI: 10.1002/andp.18962930414 · doi:10.1002/andp.18962930414
[16] von Borzeszkowski, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 27 pp 213– (1979)
[17] Boltzmann, Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien (II) 75 pp 67– (1877)
[18] Treder, Geophysik und Geologie. Geophysische Veröffentlichungen der Karl-Marx- Universität Leipzig 2 pp 7– (1980)
[19] Bohr, Det. Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 12 (1933)
[20] Treder, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin XXVI pp 13– (1977)
[21] Schrödinger, Was 1st em Naturgesetz? (1962)
[22] Schrödinger, Die Natur und die Griechen (1955)
[23] Rosenfeld, Statistical Causality in Atomistic Theory. A General Introduction to Irreversibility pp 547– (1979)
[24] Prigogine, Dialektik 5. Darwin und die Evolutionstheorie pp 121– (1982)
[25] Prigogine, Vom Sein zum Werden. Zeit und Komplexitat in den Naturwissenschaften (1979)
[26] DOI: 10.1038/181402b0 · doi:10.1038/181402b0
[27] DOI: 10.1038/1791297a0 · doi:10.1038/1791297a0
[28] DOI: 10.1038/178382a0 · doi:10.1038/178382a0
[29] DOI: 10.1038/177538a0 · doi:10.1038/177538a0
[30] Poincaré, Rev. Métaphys. Morale 1 pp 534– (1893)
[31] Planck, Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie (1955)
[32] Planck, Physikalische Gesetzlichkeit im Lichte neuerer Forschung III (1958) · JFM 52.0887.05
[33] Planck, Die Einheit des physikalischen Weitbildes III (1958)
[34] Planck, Uber den zweiten Hauptsatz der mechanischen Wärmetheorie I (1958) · JFM 11.0774.01
[35] Marx, Theorien über den Mehrwert 26 (1962)
[36] Marx, Dos Kapital III (1964)
[37] Marx, Die Wertform pp 262– (1955)
[38] Kant, Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels (1955) · JFM 22.0084.03
[39] Wahsner, Vom Mute des Erkennens. Beitrage zur Philosophie G. W. F Hegels pp 18– (1981)
[40] Helmholtz, Einleitung zu den Vorlesungen über theoretische Physik (1903)
[41] Wahsner, Das Aktive und das Passive. Zur erkenntnistheoretischen Begrundung der Physik durch den Atomismus ? dargestelit an Newton und Kant (1981)
[42] Hegel, Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie (1971)
[43] Wahsner, Mensch und Kosmos ? die copernicanische Wende (1978)
[44] Hegel, Differenz des Fichteschen und des Schellingschen System (1981)
[45] Wahsner, Wissenschaft und Fortschritt 20 pp 552– (1970)
[46] George, Selected Papers of Leon Rosenfeld pp 571– (1979) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9349-5_39
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.