×

A multicriteria decision support system for competence-driven project portfolio selection. (English) Zbl 1178.90199

Summary: The systematic and proactive development of human resources is of major importance in organizations that rely heavily on the competencies of their employees when engaging in innovative endeavors. Human capital, however, is not only a resource required for conducting research, but also the eventual result of that research. When selecting a research portfolio, the decision-maker (DM) thus needs to take into consideration both current and future competence requirements, as well as other financial and nonfinancial objectives and constraints. We introduce a proper multicriteria decision support system (MCDSS) that first determines the set of Pareto-efficient solutions and then allows the DM to interactively filter and/or explore this set in various ways. Its practical application is demonstrated by means of a showcase at the Electronic Commerce Competence Center (EC3) in Vienna, Austria.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives

Software:

TRIMAP
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1080/00207540110036696 · Zbl 1060.90679 · doi:10.1080/00207540110036696
[2] DOI: 10.1080/00207540500272519 · Zbl 1095.90575 · doi:10.1080/00207540500272519
[3] DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(96)81768-0 · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(96)81768-0
[4] Kolisch R., Res. Tech. Manage. 48 pp 33–
[5] DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.010 · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.010
[6] DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1995.tb00900.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1995.tb00900.x
[7] DOI: 10.1007/s10100-008-0057-z · Zbl 1151.91513 · doi:10.1007/s10100-008-0057-z
[8] Chen A. N. K., MIS Quart. 29 pp 279–
[9] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.02.013 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.02.013
[10] DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03315-9 · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03315-9
[11] DOI: 10.1007/b99492 · doi:10.1007/b99492
[12] DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017 · Zbl 05451853 · doi:10.1109/4235.996017
[13] DOI: 10.1023/B:ANOR.0000039513.99038.c6 · Zbl 1067.91028 · doi:10.1023/B:ANOR.0000039513.99038.c6
[14] DOI: 10.1142/S0219622008003022 · Zbl 05375507 · doi:10.1142/S0219622008003022
[15] DOI: 10.1109/17.759144 · doi:10.1109/17.759144
[16] DOI: 10.1007/s00291-008-0126-7 · Zbl 1163.90598 · doi:10.1007/s00291-008-0126-7
[17] DOI: 10.1145/42288.214372 · Zbl 0642.65003 · doi:10.1145/42288.214372
[18] P. Korhonen, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, eds. J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott (Springer, Berlin, 2004) pp. 641–666.
[19] DOI: 10.1057/jors.1978.240 · doi:10.1057/jors.1978.240
[20] DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90050-0 · Zbl 0581.90088 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90050-0
[21] DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-49298-3_27 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-49298-3_27
[22] DOI: 10.1016/0895-7177(89)90369-5 · doi:10.1016/0895-7177(89)90369-5
[23] A. Lewandowski and J. Granat, Multiple Criteria Decision Support, eds. P. Korhonen, A. Lewandowski and J. Wallenius (Springer, Berlin, 1991) pp. 229–241. · Zbl 0825.90615
[24] DOI: 10.1016/0167-9236(91)90076-N · doi:10.1016/0167-9236(91)90076-N
[25] DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(92)90039-8 · Zbl 0775.90251 · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(92)90039-8
[26] DOI: 10.1287/opre.40.2.247 · Zbl 0825.90626 · doi:10.1287/opre.40.2.247
[27] P. J. Agrell, A. Stam and B. J. Lence, Trends in Multicriteria Decision Making, eds. T. J. Stewart and R. C. Van Den Honert (Springer, Berlin, 1997) pp. 324–336.
[28] DOI: 10.1007/BF01350769 · doi:10.1007/BF01350769
[29] DOI: 10.1142/S0219622002000154 · doi:10.1142/S0219622002000154
[30] DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.07.003 · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.07.003
[31] DOI: 10.1142/S0219622007002691 · Zbl 05277229 · doi:10.1142/S0219622007002691
[32] DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.06.020 · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.06.020
[33] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.03.007 · Zbl 1067.90075 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.03.007
[34] DOI: 10.1037/h0043158 · doi:10.1037/h0043158
[35] DOI: 10.1145/5465.5469 · doi:10.1145/5465.5469
[36] DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1973.10482434 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1973.10482434
[37] DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1981.10477638 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1981.10477638
[38] DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1960.10489905 · doi:10.1080/00401706.1960.10489905
[39] DOI: 10.2307/2528964 · doi:10.2307/2528964
[40] Lotov A. V., J. Geograph. Inform. Decis. Anal. 1 pp 118–
[41] DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8851-5 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8851-5
[42] Cook D., J. Data Sci. 5 pp 151–
[43] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863
[44] DOI: 10.1007/BF01898350 · Zbl 0617.52005 · doi:10.1007/BF01898350
[45] DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10474926 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10474926
[46] Alamri A. A., Int. J. Product. Econ. 107 pp 281–
[47] DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2004.05.006 · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2004.05.006
[48] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.019 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.019
[49] DOI: 10.1007/s10479-007-0183-3 · Zbl 1157.90457 · doi:10.1007/s10479-007-0183-3
[50] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.041 · Zbl 1123.90327 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.041
[51] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.049 · Zbl 1161.91398 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.049
[52] DOI: 10.1287/opre.1050.0225 · Zbl 1165.91400 · doi:10.1287/opre.1050.0225
[53] DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511611308.021 · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511611308.021
[54] Stummer C., Central Eur. J. Oper. Res. 11 pp 253–
[55] DOI: 10.1142/S0219622006001873 · doi:10.1142/S0219622006001873
[56] DOI: 10.1142/S021962200600185X · doi:10.1142/S021962200600185X
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.