×

A two-phase model for planning the production of aluminum ingot. (English) Zbl 0913.90204

Summary: This paper addresses an important scheduling problem associated with the electromagnetic ingot casting process which is used in the production of a variety of metal alloys. The casting procedure begins when molten metal is poured into casting facilities which house a fixed number of ingot molds each of a specified width. The casting process requires that all ingots produced in a given batch be of the same alloy and length. The resulting ingots can differ only in width as determined by the particular mold configuration in a casting pit. In general, mold width changes occur infrequently since they are both costly and time consuming. Given the nature of the process, it is difficult to produce a mix of ingots that exactly matches demand. When required ingots are not available, they must be either imported from outside sources or longer, wider ingots must be trimmed (‘misapplied’), generating excess scrap. The objective of this paper is the development of an effective solution procedure for scheduling the ingot casting process which reduces ingot misapplication/import and maintains low inventory levels. A two-phase model is designed to address this problem. Application of the model at the ingot production facility of a leading US aluminum manufacturer resulted in lower average inventory levels and a decrease in ingot misapplication/import from 20.4% to 0.4% of corresponding production.

MSC:

90B90 Case-oriented studies in operations research
90B30 Production models
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Baker, G. L.; Clark, W. A.; Frund, J. J.; Wendell, R. E., Production planning and cost analysis on a microcomputer, Interfaces, 17, 53-60 (1987)
[2] Bielefeld, F. W.; Walter, K. D.; Wartmann, R., A computer-based strategic planning system for steel production, Interfaces, 16, 41-46 (1986)
[3] Box, R. E.; Herbe, D. G., A scheduling model for LTV Steel’s Cleveland Works’ twin strand continuous slab caster, Interfaces, 18, 42-56 (1988)
[4] Hansen, P.; Hugé, J., Implicit treatment of ‘zero or range’ constraints in a model for minimum cost foundry alloys, Management Science, 35, 367-371 (1989) · Zbl 0666.90038
[5] Hernandez, J. P.; Proth, J. M., A good solution instead of an optimal one, Interfaces, 12, 37-42 (1982)
[6] Jacobs, T. L.; Wright, J. R.; Cobbs, A. E., Optimal inter-process steel production scheduling, Computers & Operations Research, 15, 497-507 (1988)
[7] Narchal, R. M., A simulation model for corporate planning in a steel plant, European Journal of Operational Research, 34, 282-296 (1988)
[8] Vasko, F. J.; Wolf, F. E.; McNamara, J. A., A multiple-criteria approach to dynamic cold-ingot substitution, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 40, 361-366 (1989)
[9] Vasko, F. J.; Wolf, F. E.; Stott, K. L., Optimal selection of ingot sizes via set covering, Operations Research, 35, 346-353 (1987)
[10] Vasko, F. J.; Wolf, F. E.; Stott, K. L.; Scheirer, J. W., Selecting optimal ingot sizes for Bethlehem Steel, Interfaces, 19, 68-84 (1989)
[11] BOBderembse, M. A.; Haessler, R. W., A mathematical programming approach to schedule master slab casters in the steel industry, Management Science, 28, 1450-1461 (1982)
[12] What’s Best (1991), Lindo Systems, Inc.: Lindo Systems, Inc. Chicago, IL
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.