×

Performance of interval estimators for the inverse hypergeometric distribution. (English) Zbl 1328.62155

Summary: The inverse hypergeometric distribution is of interest in applications of inverse sampling without replacement from a finite population where a binary observation is made on each sampling unit. Thus, sampling is performed by randomly choosing units sequentially one at a time until a specified number of one of the two types is selected for the sample. Assuming the total number of units in the population is known but the number of each type is not, we consider the problem of estimating this parameter. We use the Delta method to develop approximations for the variance of three parameter estimators. We then propose three large sample confidence intervals for the parameter. Based on these results, we selected a sampling of parameter values for the inverse hypergeometric distribution to empirically investigate performance of these estimators. We evaluate their performance in terms of expected probability of parameter coverage and confidence interval length calculated as means of possible outcomes weighted by the appropriate outcome probabilities for each parameter value considered. The unbiased estimator of the parameter is the preferred estimator relative to the maximum likelihood estimator and an estimator based on a negative binomial approximation, as evidenced by empirical estimates of closeness to the true parameter value. Confidence intervals based on the unbiased estimator tend to be shorter than the two competitors because of its relatively small variance but at a slight cost in terms of coverage probability.

MSC:

62F12 Asymptotic properties of parametric estimators
00A72 General theory of simulation
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2000.10474560 · doi:10.1080/00031305.2000.10474560
[2] D’Elia A., Statistical Medelling. Proceedings of the 14th ISWM pp 468– (1999)
[3] D’Elia A., Quaderni di Statistica 3 pp 127– (2001)
[4] DOI: 10.1191/1471082X03st047oa · Zbl 1195.62014 · doi:10.1191/1471082X03st047oa
[5] D’Elia A., Modelli complessi e metodi computazionali intensivi per la stima e la previsione pp 245– (2005)
[6] DOI: 10.2307/2528901 · Zbl 1149.62317 · doi:10.2307/2528901
[7] DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1975.tb00257.x · Zbl 0322.62019 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.1975.tb00257.x
[8] DOI: 10.1002/0471715816 · Zbl 1092.62010 · doi:10.1002/0471715816
[9] Johnson N.L., Distributions in Statistics: Discrete Distributions (1969) · Zbl 0292.62009
[10] DOI: 10.1198/000313007X245140 · Zbl 05680758 · doi:10.1198/000313007X245140
[11] Moran P.A. P., An Introduction to Probability Theory (1968)
[12] Piccolo D., Quaderni di Statistica 4 pp 199– (2002)
[13] Wilks S., Mathematical Statistics (1963) · Zbl 0060.29502
[14] DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953
[15] DOI: 10.1002/0470868902 · Zbl 1096.62128 · doi:10.1002/0470868902
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.